STATEMENT ON THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION ON THE PHILIPPINES AND THE REMARKS OF MEP HEIDI HAUTALA

We condemn the misguided attempt of the European Parliament to interfere in the Philippine electoral process through its Resolution raising already discredited allegations of human rights violations in the thin hope of heavily influencing the outcome in favor of its choice.

The allegations raised in the Resolution are unfair, largely baseless, prompted by European supporters of libelous journalists and bitter critics of the current administration because they miserably lost the previous election. The Resolution is based on a deliberately falsified impression of the actual human rights situation in the country. The Resolution is presumptuous given the historical record of its main proponents.

Far from what is presented in the Resolution, the Philippines is a vibrant democracy that respects and protects the freedoms of every citizen; and upholds all their rights, preeminently the rights to life, liberty, and, above all, safety and protection from the lawless and violent.

The allegations are already addressed by the landmark UN Joint Program (UNJP) for Human Rights, which was framed precisely to address these baseless allegations, respectful of the legal and accountable mechanisms that are already set in place of a fully functioning Philippine democracy which is more than can be said of its traducers.

The UNJP embodies the spirit of partnership, trust-building and constructive engagement of the Human Rights Council resolution 45/33 jointly initiated by the Philippines and Iceland. Substantive, credible and forward-looking, the UNJP seeks to strengthen the Philippines’ compliance with international human rights obligations, fortify the human rights dimension in law enforcement and investigative work, and enhance the capacity of national institutions and actors to promote and protect human rights while keeping the public safe: the paramount obligation of a state and the justification for the expense of maintaining one.

The UNJP covers alleged cases of extrajudicial killings involving militants and trade union leaders, and deaths arising from the anti-illegal drug campaign to avert the fate of Central America. The Philippine justice system continues to ensure a safe and enabling civic space for civil society of all stripes including human rights defenders.

Following an inclusive and transparent process of consultations, the UNJP was launched in July 2021 in the presence of among others, Chargé d’Affaires Rafael de Bustamante Tello of the Delegation of the European Union to the Philippines. He welcomed it warmly.

We therefore strongly advise EU Parliament Vice President Heidi Hautala to prove her information, specifically with the EU Delegation to the Philippines before she demands anything from the Philippines. Her disrespectful language disregards these ongoing efforts of the Philippines and the United Nations, and the mechanisms and processes that inform their joint efforts to advance human rights.

We advise European Parliamentarians to listen to more respectable sources than the militant front organizations masquerading as legitimate civil society organizations; the usual disgruntled members of a forlorn political opposition who clearly do not represent the majority of the Philippine electorate; and journalists who have a clear political agenda other than reporting the news in a fair and accurate manner.

While the European Parliamentarians are once again calling on the Philippines to adhere to democratic principles that Filipinos have widely practiced in the performance and hardly if ever in the breach, they themselves have violated these principles; not least when they refuse to pay heed to the democratic will of the vast majority of the Filipino people who clearly support the present duly-elected government and its policies. For the Parliament to pass a Resolution of this manner is a clear attempt to influence the outcome of our coming elections in May instead of accepting the sovereign will of the Filipino people as manifested in the previous elections. That is yet another unfortunate intrusion in the internal affairs of a genuinely democratic republic which only seeks to maintain harmonious relations with the European Union and all its Member States on the basis of equality and mutual respect.

We understand that the views of the Members of the European Parliament do not reflect those of the European Union as a whole or of its individual member states. Our engagement with the European Commission on the GSP+ process is a more accurate indication of the actual situation involving good governance, rule of law and human rights in the Philippines. We look forward to welcoming the next EU GSP+ monitoring mission on 28 February to 4 March 2022.

 

 

Source: Republic of Philippines Department Of Foreign Affairs

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *