Why nonviolent resistance is the key to a democratic China

The principle of nonviolence is rooted in the idea that justice can only be achieved through just means. Since Mahatma Gandhi founded his nonviolent resistance movement that eventually won India her independence, the idea has become accepted around the world, and the United Nations has designated Oct. 2 “International Nonviolence Day.”

The nonviolent resistance theory of the late American scholar Gene Sharp, a lifelong advocate for this form of resistance, has been credited with inspiring color revolutions in former Soviet bloc countries, the Jasmine Revolution in Tunisia, and the Arab Spring.

Nonviolent resistance is also emerging as the fundamental mode of protest against authoritarian rule for Chinese citizens, and sthe one that has the most impact.

From the fearless action of Peng Lifa on Beijing’s Sitong Bridge in October 2022, to Nanjing University of Media and Communications student Li Kangmeng, who was the first to silently raise a blank sheet of A4, kicking off the “white paper” protests that were to spread across China and make global headlines a few weeks later, there are plenty of examples.

In my view, nonviolent resistance isn’t just the main practical way to oppose authoritarian states today. It also holds significant implications for China’s future ability to achieve a peaceful political transition and establish a democratic government. We need to uphold this fundamental concept.

Protesters hold up blank pieces of paper and chant slogans as they march to protest strict COVID-19 measures in Beijing, Nov. 27, 2022. (Ng Han Guan/AP)
Protesters hold up blank pieces of paper and chant slogans as they march to protest strict COVID-19 measures in Beijing, Nov. 27, 2022. (Ng Han Guan/AP)

It’s a practical, feasible approach that ordinary people can incorporate into their daily lives. Its various forms, 198 of which were set out by Gene Sharp, are easily adopted, applied, and disseminated by the general public, making it unpredictable, and hard for authoritarian regimes to counter preemptively.

And it’s gaining traction among the people.

The goal in engaging in such tactics today is to end the totalitarian rule of the Chinese Communist Party and secure human rights and civil liberties for China’s people. To achieve this, we must build unity among various civil forces.

Nonviolent resistance is our only option today, not just because we lack firearms or because it aligns with our moral principles, but because it’s a necessity for the future – for pushing ahead towards a constitutional democracy, and eventually achieving democracy through peaceful means.

Because the collapse of authoritarian tyranny doesn’t automatically lead to constitutional democracy. Following the collapse of any authoritarian regime, there is the daunting task of clearing away the rubble and constructing a new political community, something that may prove much harder than overthrowing totalitarian rule in the first place.

When China enters its post-Chinese Communist Party era, people from different regions and ethnicities will have diverse ideas and demands. The complexity of addressing these contradictions and disputes may well surpass that of any other country in the world. Peaceful, rational communication, negotiation, and cooperation will become urgently necessary.

Violence could emerge

Commitment to nonviolent resistance means that we must consider our interests, but also those of our children and future generations to come, and we must continue to adhere to the principle of nonviolence throughout the whole process: in standing up to the tyranny of an authoritarian government today, but also in opposing the tyranny of the majority and protecting everyone’s human rights and civil liberties tomorrow.

Only then can we lay a solid foundation on which to build our future democracy, and prevent our progress towards democracy from being interrupted by a series of crises, as it was a century ago.

What’s more, violence may emerge at any stage of China’s political transition, and we must prepare to deal with it.

Plenty of those killed by the Chinese Communist Party, including Lin Zhao, Yu Luoke, Liu Xiaobo, and the students on Tiananmen Square in 1989, didn’t engage in violence, yet they still lost their lives at the hands of the authoritarian regime.

So we know that we’re facing an authoritarian regime that has no regard for the basic principles of humanity and no moral boundaries. Yet nonviolent resistance doesn’t mean people can’t defend themselves when the sword of authoritarian tyranny is raised against them.

Under such circumstances, keeping to the path of nonviolent resistance becomes even more challenging, requiring unwavering conviction, courage, wisdom, and long-term resilience. 

We need to unite more people in this effort, because violence may be part of the reality of China’s political transition. Many in China and overseas worry about potential chaos in China if Communist Party rule were to suddenly collapse, leaving a power vacuum and societal breakdown.

Security guards stop journalists from entering the apartment house where Liu Xia, wife of Liu Xiaobo, stays in Beijing, Oct. 8, 2010. Chinese dissident Liu Xiaobo won the 2010 Nobel Peace Prize for "his long and nonviolent struggle for fundamental human rights." (Andy Wong/AP)
Security guards stop journalists from entering the apartment house where Liu Xia, wife of Liu Xiaobo, stays in Beijing, Oct. 8, 2010. Chinese dissident Liu Xiaobo won the 2010 Nobel Peace Prize for “his long and nonviolent struggle for fundamental human rights.” (Andy Wong/AP)

In such a scenario, Chinese refugees might overwhelm neighboring Asian countries or even Europe and America, disrupting global peace and stability.

Back home, long-suppressed hatred could erupt into acts of violence.

Such fears are not unreasonable. China lacks a universally respected leader, a law-abiding culture, or any kind of guiding force transcending the political realm.

But that risk doesn’t justify continued authoritarian rule in any way.

On the contrary, it underscores the need for us to oppose violence and use the power of the law to hold criminal elements of the authoritarian regime to account for their crimes against the people, to ensure justice is done.

Complex and arduous transition

To achieve this, we will need to work together to maintain normal economic and social life, minimize acts of violence, reduce social unrest, and lessen the social cost of China’s political transition. 

Only then can we gain genuine support from the international community and help the Chinese people to achieve effective political change.

Later, there may also be dissenting opinions and conflicts among the various forces that previously united against authoritarian rule. We must respond to this in a reasonable manner, and engage in democratic negotiations using nonviolent principles at all times, and never resort to violence to resolve disputes.

We will all need to better ourselves, if we’re to do this. China’s political transition will be complex and arduous, and will demand a high level of cultural literacy. 

The process of political transition is also one of self-education, self-reflection, and self-improvement.

Above all, we must guard against falling into authoritarian thinking as a way to counter authoritarianism. 

Chinese people have been steeped in authoritarian ideology from kindergarten to university, and every one of us has been marked by this kind of thinking.

Anyone advocating nonviolent resistance, anyone who aspires to freedom, democracy, and constitutional governance, must first purge themselves of the “wolf’s milk” they were raised on. 

That includes, but isn’t limited to extremist forms of thinking, a belief in our own infallibility, insistence on ideological uniformity, intolerance of dissenting opinions, a zero-sum mentality, a black-and-white worldview and a general willingness to employ any means necessary to achieve our goals.

A group of Christians sing hymns in a peaceful protest against a plan to allow extraditions to the mainland, in Hong Kong on June 11, 2019. (Anthony Walace/AFP)
A group of Christians sing hymns in a peaceful protest against a plan to allow extraditions to the mainland, in Hong Kong on June 11, 2019. (Anthony Walace/AFP)

From an early age, the Chinese Communist Party has poisoned our hearts with hatred, which can make individuals exceptionally ruthless, hindering the development of kindness, empathy, and compassion, making them cruel and inhumane. 

Once hatred takes hold, individuals become quick to anger and hostile, resorting to foul language, verbal abuse and personal attacks against those with differing opinions, something we often see on social media platforms.

Many people have also been influenced by the Chinese Communist Party’s insistence on “unity,” which could prove challenging as we try in future to deal rationally and peacefully with the diverse wishes, cultural traditions, religious beliefs and regional interests of different ethnic groups and populations in China. 

Only by consciously rejecting the ideology of “unity,” and respecting and protecting the rights of every individual, particularly the right to choose one’s fate freely, can we avoid imposing our own desires on others and prevent the authoritarian regime from using us to harm different [non-Han Chinese] ethnic groups. 

We must expose their crimes and lies, perpetrated under the guise of “safeguarding national unity.”

We must broaden our horizons and embrace any valuable ideas, knowledge, and theories that will further China’s political transition. We need to join forces with like-minded individuals, while also learning to compromise, accept and include.

Only then can we pave the way for a brighter future where democracy is firmly established, and the lessons of the past are not forgotten.

Translated by Luisetta Mudie.

Cai Xia, a retired professor of the Central Party School of the Chinese Communist Party, was expelled from the party and had her pension stripped in August 2020 for “serious violations of political discipline” following her criticism of the increasingly authoritarian policies of Xi Jinping, party chief and state president. She is currently based in the United States. The views expressed here are Cai’s own and do not reflect the position of Radio Free Asia.

(2nd LD) S. Korea calls on Moscow to act responsibly as Russian deputy FM visits Seoul


SEOUL, South Korea has called for Moscow to act responsibly, the foreign ministry said Sunday, as a senior Russian diplomat visited Seoul for talks on regional security.

Andrey Rudenko, the Russian deputy foreign minister in charge of the Asia-Pacific region, met with Deputy Foreign Minister Chung Byung-won on Friday and addressed the Ukrainian war and bilateral ties, the ministry said in a press release.

Chung expressed South Korea’s “stern stance” on Russia’s growing military cooperation with North Korea and called for Moscow’s “responsible behavior.”

He then urged Russia’s cooperation to prevent any infringement on the legitimate rights of South Korean firms and citizens in Russia.

During his visit, Rudenko also paid a courtesy visit on First Vice Foreign Minister Kim Hong-kyun and held talks with Kim Gunn, South Korea’s top nuclear envoy.

Kim called on Moscow to strictly comply with its obligations to United Nations Security Council resolutions, including the immediate cessation of its military ties
with Pyongyang that threaten the security of the Korean Peninsula and Europe.

Rudenko’s trip comes amid a chasm between South Korea and Russia as the two sides stand at odds over President Yoon Suk Yeol’s recent remarks on North Korea.

On Wednesday, Yoon described the North as an “irrational group” and the only country in the world that has legalized the preemptive use of nuclear weapons.

Russian foreign ministry spokesperson Maria Zakharova criticized Yoon’s remarks for being “blatantly biased” in a commentary released the following day.

In response, the Seoul foreign ministry summoned Russian Ambassador to South Korea Georgy Zinoviev to lodge a protest over the spokesperson’s remark.

Rudenko’s visit was initially expected last September but was postponed at the last minute.

Source: Yonhap News Agency

DP leader Lee visits ex-President Moon ahead of April elections


SEOUL, Former President Moon Jae-in met with main opposition leader Lee Jae-myung on Sunday and called for unity to win April’s general elections.

Moon stressed that a sense of urgency and earnest desire are crucial in winning elections as Lee of the main opposition Democratic Party (DP) visited Moon’s home in the southeastern city of Yangsan, DP spokesperson Park Sung-joon told reporters.

Lee said the DP will strive to unite by dissolving any division and conflict within the party, and put in all efforts to win the general elections.

Lee had been scheduled to visit Moon last month, but his trip was canceled after he was stabbed in the neck during a visit to the southeastern city of Busan on Jan. 2.

Source: Yonhap News Agency

2 lawmakers of main opposition party not to join new party ahead of April elections


SEOUL, Two lawmakers of the Democratic Party (DP) who announced their departure from the main opposition party said Sunday they would not join a new party to be formed by a former leader of the DP, ahead of the April 10 parliamentary elections.

Reps. Cho Eung-chon and Lee Won-wook said they decided not to join the new party, which is to be formed by Lee Nak-yon, a former leader of the DP, “for greater integration.”

With the two lawmakers deciding not to join the new party, only a sitting lawmaker of the DP, Rep. Kim Jong-min, is expected to join the party.

The three lawmakers had left the main opposition party, criticizing the way DP Chairman Lee Jae-myung runs the party, amid views that they are unlikely to win party nominations in the upcoming elections.

The series of departures raised questions about whether there will be more people leaving the DP, especially sitting lawmakers, and how much impact this will have on the parliamentary elections less than three months away.

Park Won-suk, a former lawma
ker who is part of preparations for the new party, told reporters the envisioned party aims to set policies for the middle-income class, as well as national interests.

Source: Yonhap News Agency

Gov’t mulls raising health insurance premiums for sustainability


SEOUL, South Korea will begin discussions on raising state health insurance premiums in order to make the program sustainable amid the low birth rate and aging population, the health ministry said Sunday.

The government has outlined the second comprehensive state health insurance program for the 2024-2028 period, with the aim of revising up the monthly premium limit of 8 percent for salaried workers to reflect soaring medical expenses, according to the Ministry of Health and Welfare.

The latest plan comes as the country’s birth rate continues to fall and its elderly population aged 70 and older surpassed those in their 20s for the first time last year amid an economic slowdown.

The government said it will start discussions to determine the “proper rate” of monthly premiums, referring to premium rates in other countries, as the insurance program’s sustainability is at risk over time.

The corresponding premiums in Germany, France and Japan are much higher at 16.2 percent, 13.25 percent and 10-11.82 percent
, respectively, according to the ministry.

To help finance the state insurance program, the government will make efforts to explore new sources of income.

The government plans to make those who earn an unexpected or one-off income pay an additional premium for their earnings as it did with high-income YouTubers.

For the year of 2024, the ministry froze the monthly premium rate at 7.09 percent for the first time in seven years due to the “relatively stable” financial status of the insurance program, high inflation and interest rates.

It marked the third time for South Korea to freeze the premium, including the decisions made for 2017 and 2009.

By law, South Koreans are required to join the insurance scheme, and foreigners living here can also subscribe to it.

Source: Yonhap News Agency

Año: Gov’t to use ‘resolute’ force to quell attempts to divide PH

MANILA: National Security Adviser Eduardo Año emphasized on Sunday that the government will do everything to prevent any attempt to dismember the country.

‘Any attempt to secede any part of the Philippines will be met by the government with resolute force,” Año said in a statement as he rejected the idea to separate Mindanao from the rest of the Philippines.

The government, he said, would remain steadfast in securing the sovereignty and integrity of the national territory.

“The National Government will not hesitate to use its authority and forces to quell and stop any and all attempts to dismember the Republic,’ Año, also the chief of the National Security Council (NSC), added.

He also urged the public to remain vigilant against those who would attempt to sow discord, which, he added, would undermine the country’s hard-won gains in pursuing peace and development, particularly in Mindanao.

“The strength of our country lies in our unity and any attempt to sow division must be rejected by all sectors unequi
vocally. It is imperative for all Filipinos to uphold the principles enshrined in our Constitution which espouses the unity and territorial integrity of our nation,” Año said.

Many local Mindanao leaders have already expressed opposition to the call made by former President Rodrigo Duterte to separate Mindanao from the rest of the country.

“While recognizing the richness of Mindanao’s natural resources and culture, it is essential to approach discussions about its development and autonomy within the framework of national unity, solidarity, and supremacy of the Constitution,’ he said.

He also maintained that the comprehensive peace process, which led to the end of decades of armed conflict in Mindanao, must be safeguarded at all times as “the dividends of peace are now clearly evident in the transformation of the entire Mindanao from a region of volatility and violence to one of progress, stability, hope.”

Earlier, Interior Secretary Benjamin Abalos Jr. said that secession is not the solution to Mindanao’s
problems, as he urged all stakeholders to uphold the sanctity of the Philippine Constitution for a strong, united, and undivided nation.

‘Secession is not the answer to Mindanao’s concerns. It would violate the fundamental tenets of our Constitution. It would destroy the territorial integrity of the Philippines, and disrupt decades of painstaking effort to build a stronger union among all our peoples and ethnicities,’ he said in a statement on Saturday.

Abalos said the people’s right to self-determination, which means pursuing political, economic, social, and cultural development while respecting the state’s territorial integrity and legal processes should be exercised within the framework of the State.

‘Indeed, the people of Mindanao have the freedom to make political choices or pursue economic, social, and cultural progress. Various mechanisms make manifest the government’s respect and recognition for the development needs of Mindanao, such as the establishment of the Bangsamoro Autonomous Region in Musl
im Mindanao (BARRM),’ he said.

Abalos said BARMM is a powerful example of addressing historical grievances and providing self-governance within the bounds of Philippine law.

Source: Philippines News Agency