Getting rich during China’s boom – then fleeing as prospects darken

As President Xi Jinping began a third term in office pledging “Chinese-style modernization” in October 2022, commentators expected him to steer China further in the direction of a state-dominated, planned economy.

Xi’s ideology sounded an ominous note for the private sector, as well as for private individual wealth and influence.

Meanwhile, three years of China’s zero-COVID policy sounded the death knell for many private companies, prompting an exodus of wealthy and middle-class Chinese who had previously benefited from the post-Mao economic boom.

Meng Jun, a former vegetable salesman-turned-flight charter agent-turned-rubber factory boss who now lives in Florida, was one of them.

“When the pandemic hit, I started to reflect on things, and to watch what was happening,” Meng Jun, who once headed up three companies turning out rubber goods in Guangxi, Chongqing and Beijing with a total turnover of 300 million yuan a year, told Radio Free Asia.

“And I found that the actual problem was with the system as a whole, which made people bad,” he said. “I figured that if I carried on much longer, I’d get dragged down with some official, because, as someone who gave bribes, I would be implicated.”

Meng in his heyday was a smooth operator, cashing in on relationships cultivated with local officials in his main stamping ground in the southeastern region of Guangxi.

In 2000, officials in Guangxi’s Beihai city let him get his hands on an unfinished property, thanks to a total lack of transparency around government property deals, and a 200,000 yuan kickback to a local official.

ENG_CHN_EntrepreneursRun_06212023.2.jpg
Meng Jun bought this unfinished government-owned building in Guangxi’s Beihai city in 2000 and then flipped it for a profit. Credit: Provided by Meng Jun

“I moved very quickly, and made a million in less than six months,” Meng said. “I just packaged it up to some kind of rough standard and sold it on.”

“There were so many unfinished buildings around at that time, more than a million square meters, all of them owned by [the local government].”

‘Total U-turn’

Former tech CEO Hu Liren knew as early as 2018 that it was time to leave.

“Nobody wants to leave their home country,” Hu, who also lives in Florida, where he has become friends with Meng, told Radio Free Asia. “But I had no choice.”

“Things had gotten so bad in China, and there was no way they were going to get better,” he said, in a reference to Xi Jinping’s renewed emphasis on state-owned assets and a planned economy.

“In the four years since I left, there has been a total U-turn, exactly the way I thought there would be at the time.”

It’s a far cry from the economic boom-time of the 1990s where both Hu and Meng made their fortunes.

Back then, in 1994, China was putting out more than 2% of global economic output, while the number of private companies grew from zero in 1978 to 1.76 million by 2000.

ENG_CHN_EntrepreneursRun_06212023.3.jpg
Hu Liren and his team when he was the CEO of an internet company in China in 2000. Credit: Provided by Hu Liren

“It was great, very prosperous,” Meng said. “As long as you worked hard and gave it your all, you could make a lot of money.”

“Everything was plain sailing, and it was possible to succeed at anything you did, and make money at it, too,” he said with a sigh.

The private sector was booming so hard back then that the catchphrase “56789” was born, the first and last digits reminding people that it was contributing around 50% of government tax revenues, and was the source of around 90% of new jobs.

‘To get rich is glorious’

Deng’s golden era of market liberalization and breakneck economic growth spawned other catchphrases too, like “To get rich is glorious,” giving the go-ahead to an emerging generation of private entrepreneurs, freed from the political orthodoxies of Maoist China.

Hu and Meng were among them.

Born in the northeastern province of Jilin to working-class parents who were made redundant during the mass layoffs of the late 1980s, Meng started working various jobs straight out of high school in 1989.

“I would sell vegetables and do other seasonal stuff with my friends, all across Jilin, Yanji, Changchun and Mudanjiang,” he said, referring to cities in northeastern China.

His search for work took him to the southern island province of Hainan, where he eventually saved enough money to open up his own seafood restaurant in 1993.

ENG_CHN_EntrepreneursRun_06212023.4.png
Meng Jun in 2010. Credit: Provided by Meng Jun

“During that period from 1993 to 2000, I started my own seafood restaurant, and also got into chartered flights,” Meng said. “That was very profitable because at that time I had a monopoly.”

“Then I started doing cross-border trade, because I knew Vietnam, which was really actually smuggling,” he said, adding that he raked in nearly 500 million yuan at that time.

Raking it in

Hu was born in Shanghai to a family of intellectuals and started working in a research institute focusing on television technology in the mid-1980s. When the institute was shut down in 1991, he found work at a foreign company.

By the time the internet was changing the face of business in 1997, Hu was also raking in the money, working for a company owned by Hong Kong tycoon Li Ka-shing, Mei Ya Online.

“I became the director and executive vice president of this Mei Ya Online, and I had equity in it.” he said. “The annual income at that time was 400,000 to 500,000 yuan.”

Boosted by stellar connections with He Xingtong, grandson of Communist Party elder He Long, and invited to lecture to officials in Shanghai and Beijing, Hu went on to run an investment research and credit ratings company, as well as founding a green tech company making air-conditioning systems for factory shop floors.

ENG_CHN_EntrepreneursRun_06212023.5.jpg
Hu Liren during his entrepreneurial era. Credit: Provided by Hu Liren

“We were growing at a rate where we were doubling our profits annually,” he said of the air-conditioning business. “Our output was around six million yuan in 2016, then 12 million in 2017.”

“We managed to recoup our entire initial investment in just three years.”

Hu was approached by a Hong Kong-based fund manager to lead research projects into the technology sector, and soon rose to be a well-known industry guru, giving lectures to high-ranking officials at the Shanghai Science and Technology Commission, the Ministry of Science and Technology, and Shanghai’s prestigious Fudan University.

“I had it all back then in China,” he said. “I was more capable than most people, and it paid dividends: By the end of the 1990s I was making almost as much as [my counterparts] overseas.”

Time to leave

Then, Hu’s company was accused of making fake goods after an air-conditioning system it installed in Shandong province started leaking.

The leak was traced to fake, and therefore substandard, piping supplied by a local company, but local officials threw Hu and his company under the bus instead, and Hu knew it was time to leave.

He shut down the company, losing millions of yuan worth of orders, his entire business sunk by a contract worth 6 million yuan, and bought a ticket for the United States.

Meanwhile, Meng’s businesses were still going full steam ahead when the pandemic hit the central city of Wuhan in late 2019.

Yet there had been rumblings that things were about to change for the private sector — and the privately wealthy.

“Some of my friends in government warned me that private business owners were about to start feeling a lot of political pressure,” he said, adding that he didn’t quite realize what that meant at the time.

Pandemic hits

And when the pandemic emerged, he thought it would all blow over in a few months, much as the SARS crisis had done in 2003.

“I just thought it would be another SARS,” he said. “I still had a large number of orders on the books at that time.”

“The whole country started to lock down at the end of January, but by May 1, the lockdowns had already started to lift,” he said, adding that he still planned to add a production line in May, and import a large quantity of raw materials.

ENG_CHN_EntrepreneursRun_06212023.6.jpg
One of Meng Jun’s three rubber factories, which together produced 300 million yuan in revenue a year. Credit: Provided by Meng Jun

Then, the order came down for the factory to close, and that was that.

“All in all, we were in production for less than 90 days from May until the end of the year,” he said.

Unable to fill all those orders, Meng was forced to lay off staff to cut costs.

By October 2021, the situation was so dire that Meng decided to shut everything down, after receiving nothing at all from the government in the form of subsidies or compensation, facing losses of more than 10 million yuan.

And he wasn’t alone. Some 90% of companies in the same industrial park as Meng’s company also shut down.

The rot had set in, and there has been no hoped-for economic rebound in 2023, despite the lifting of the stringent restrictions of the zero-COVID policy following nationwide protests in November 2022.

Hu and Meng became friends after meeting in a restaurant in Miami in April.

“I thought he looked depressed, and asked him how he was doing,” Meng said. “We’d never met before, so we started chatting.”

Both are now struggling to come to terms with their reversal of fate.

“I haven’t been doing so great this year,” Meng said. “The career I worked so hard on for so many years is gone, and I can’t go back and start anything.”

Hu feels the same way.

“The technology I produced was mostly aimed at manufacturing, which is basically finished now,” Hu said. “The industry has totally collapsed since I left.” 

“Nobody is doing it any more, and they’re not likely to start up again.”

Translated by Luisetta Mudie. Edited by Malcolm Foster.

INOVIO Announces Notice of Pendency and Proposed Settlement of Stockholder Derivative Actions

Plymouth Meeting, Pa., June 23, 2023 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) —


INOVIO (NASDAQ:INO) has released the following pursuant to an order of the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE INOVIO PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. DERIVATIVE LITIGATION Lead Case No. 2:20-cv-01962-GJP

 

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF STOCKHOLDER
DERIVATIVE ACTIONS

TO:        ALL RECORD HOLDERS AND BENEFICIAL OWNERS OF INOVIO PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. (“INOVIO” OR THE “COMPANY”) COMMON STOCK AS OF MARCH 31, 2023.

PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY AND IN ITS ENTIRETY. THIS NOTICE RELATES TO A PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF STOCKHOLDER DERIVATIVE LITIGATION AND CONTAINS IMPORTANT INFORMATION REGARDING YOUR RIGHTS.

IF THE COURT APPROVES THE SETTLEMENT OF THE DERIVATIVE ACTIONS, CURRENT INOVIO STOCKHOLDERS WILL BE FOREVER BARRED FROM CONTESTING THE APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE, AND FROM PURSUING RELEASED CLAIMS.

THIS ACTION IS NOT A “CLASS ACTION.” THUS, THERE IS NO COMMON FUND UPON WHICH YOU CAN MAKE A CLAIM FOR A MONETARY PAYMENT.

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this action is being settled on the terms set forth in a Stipulation of Settlement dated March 31, 2023 (the “Stipulation”). The purpose of this Notice is to inform you of:

  • the existence of the above-captioned consolidated derivative action pending in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (the “Court”) captioned In re Inovio Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Derivative Litigation, Lead Case No. 2:20-cv-01962-GJP (the “Federal Action”);
  • the existence of a similar derivative action pending in the Delaware Court of Chancery (the “Chancery Court”) captioned Schumacher v. Benito, et al., Case No. 2022-0292- KJSM (the “Delaware Chancery Action” and, together with the Federal Action, the “Derivative Actions”);
  • the existence of a pending stockholder litigation demand served on the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) to investigate and bring action against the Individual Defendants1 following stockholder demands to produce books and records pursuant to Section 220 of the Delaware General Corporations Law (collectively, the “Demands”);
  • the proposed settlement between Plaintiffs and Defendants reached in the Derivative Actions and the Demands (the “Settlement”),
  • the hearing to be held by the Court to consider the fairness, reasonableness, and adequacy of the Settlement and dismissal of the Federal Action with prejudice,
  • Plaintiffs’ Counsel’s application to the Court for a Fee and Expense Amount, and
  • Plaintiffs’ Counsel’s application to the Court for case Service Awards to the Plaintiffs.

This Notice describes what steps you may take in relation to the Settlement. This Notice is not an expression of any opinion by the Court about the truth or merits of Plaintiffs’ claims or Defendants’ defenses. This Notice is solely to advise you of the proposed Settlement of the Derivative Actions and of your rights in connection with the proposed Settlement.

Summary

On March 31, 2023, Inovio, in its capacity as a nominal defendant, entered into the Stipulation to resolve the Derivative Actions and the Demands, which Stipulation was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia Division (the “Court”). The Derivative Actions and Demands were brought on behalf of Inovio against certain current and former directors and officers of the Company. Inovio was named as a nominal defendant in the Derivative Actions. The Stipulation and the settlement contemplated therein (the “Settlement”), subject to the approval of the Court, are intended by the Settling Parties to fully, finally, and forever compromise, resolve, discharge, and settle the Released Claims and to result in the complete dismissal of the Derivative Actions with prejudice, and resolution of the Demands, upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Stipulation. The proposed Settlement requires the Company to adopt and maintain certain corporate governance reforms and procedures, as outlined in Exhibit A to the Stipulation (the “Corporate Governance Reforms”).

In recognition of the substantial benefits conferred upon Inovio as a direct result of the Corporate Governance Reforms achieved through the prosecution and Settlement of the Derivative Actions and the Demands, and subject to Court approval, the Settling Parties agreed on February 17, 2023 that Inovio shall pay to Plaintiffs’ Counsel attorneys’ fees and expenses in the amount of one million one hundred seventy-five thousand dollars ($1,175,000.00) (the “Fee and Expense Amount”), subject to Court approval. Plaintiffs’ Counsel shall also apply to the Court for service awards to be paid to each of the eight Plaintiffs in an amount of up to one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500.00) each (the “Service Awards”), to be paid out of the Fee and Expense Amount.

This notice is a summary only and does not describe all of the details of the Stipulation. For full details of the matters discussed in this summary, please see the full Stipulation and its exhibits posted on the investor relations page of the Company’s website, www.inovio.com, contact Plaintiffs’ Counsel at the addresses listed below, or inspect the full Stipulation filed with the Clerk of the Court.

What are the Lawsuits About?

The Derivative Actions and Demands are brought derivatively on behalf of nominal defendant Inovio and allege that, inter alia, between February 14, 2020 and September 28, 2020, at least, the Individual Defendants breached their fiduciary duties by issuing and/or causing the Company to issue materially false and misleading statements and by failing to disclose material facts to the public regarding the effectiveness and FDA approval of the Company’s COVID-19 vaccine candidate (“INO-4800”), the development of INO-4800, and Inovio’s capacity to manufacture the vaccine, by failing to maintain adequate internal controls, and by engaging in improper insider selling. The Derivative Actions and Demands allege that, as a result of the foregoing, the Company experienced reputational and financial harm.

Why is there a Settlement of the Federal Action?

The Court has not decided in favor of Defendants or the Federal Plaintiffs. Instead, the parties to this action have agreed to the Settlement to avoid the distraction, costs, and risks of further litigation, and because the Company has determined that the Corporate Governance Reforms that the Company has adopted and will adopt as part of the Settlement provide substantial benefits to Inovio and its stockholders.

Defendants have denied and continue to deny each and all of the claims and contentions alleged by the Plaintiffs in the Derivative Actions and the Demands. Defendants have expressly denied and continue to deny all charges of wrongdoing or liability against them arising out of any of the conduct, statements, acts, or omissions alleged, or that could have been alleged, in the Derivative Actions and the Demands. Nonetheless, Defendants have concluded that it is desirable for the Derivative Actions and the Demands to be fully and finally settled in the matter and upon the terms and conditions set forth in this Stipulation.

The Settlement Hearing, and Your Right to Object to the Settlement

On June 14, 2023, the Court entered an order preliminarily approving the Stipulation and the Settlement contemplated therein (the “Preliminary Approval Order”) and providing for notice of the Settlement to be made to current Inovio stockholders (“Current Inovio Stockholders”). The Preliminary Approval Order further provides that the Court will hold a hearing (the “Settlement Hearing”) on October 11, 2023 at 10:00 a.m. before the Honorable Gerald J. Pappert at the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia Division, James A. Byrne U.S. Courthouse, 601 Market Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19106 to among other things: (i) determine whether the proposed Settlement is fair, reasonable and adequate and in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders; (ii) consider any objections to the Settlement submitted in accordance with this Notice; (iii) determine whether a judgment should be entered dismissing all claims in the Federal Action with prejudice, and releasing the Released Claims against the Released Persons; (iv) whether the Court should approve the agreed-to Fee and Expense Amount; (v) whether the Court should approve the Service Awards, which shall be funded from the Fee and Expense Amount to the extent approved by the Court; and (vii) consider any other matters that may properly be brought before the Court in connection with the Settlement. Upon final approval of the Settlement, the Derivative Plaintiffs will voluntarily dismiss their complaints with prejudice, and the Demands will be withdrawn.

The Court may, in its discretion, change the date and/or time of the Settlement Hearing without further notice to you. The Court also has reserved the right to hold the Settlement Hearing telephonically or by videoconference without further notice to you. If you intend to attend the Settlement Hearing, please consult the Court’s calendar or the investor relations page of the Company’s website, www.inovio.com, for any change in date, time or format of the Settlement Hearing.

Any Current Inovio Stockholder who wishes to object to the fairness, reasonableness, or adequacy of the Settlement as set forth in the Stipulation, or to the Fee and Expense Amount or Service Awards, may file with the Court a written objection. An objector must, at least twenty-one (21) calendar days prior to the Settlement Hearing: (1) file with the Clerk of the Court and serve (either by hand delivery or by first class mail) upon the below listed counsel a written objection to the Settlement setting forth (i) a written notice of objection with the case name and number (In re Inovio Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Derivative Litigation, Lead Case No. 2:20-cv-01962-GJP (E.D. Pa.)); (ii) the Person’s name, legal address, and telephone number; (iii) notice of whether such Person intends to appear at the Settlement Hearing and the reasons such Person desires to appear and be heard, and whether such Person is represented by counsel and if so, contact information for counsel; (iv) competent evidence that such Person held shares of Inovio common stock as of the date of the Stipulation and continues to hold such stock as of the date the objection is made, including the date(s) such shares were acquired; (v) a statement of objections to any matters before the Court, the grounds therefor, as well as all documents or writings such Person desires the Court to consider; and (vi) the identities of any witnesses such Person plans on calling at the Settlement Hearing, along with a summary description of their expected testimony. Any objector who does not timely file and serve a notice of intention to appear in accordance with this paragraph shall be foreclosed from raising any objection to the Settlement and shall not be permitted to appear at the Settlement Hearing, except for good cause shown.

IF YOU MAKE A WRITTEN OBJECTION, IT MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE CLERK OF THE COURT NO LATER THAN SEPTEMBER 20, 2023. The Clerk’s address is:

Clerk of the Court,
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia Division
James A. Byrne U.S. Courthouse
601 Market Street
Philadelphia, PA 19106

YOU ALSO MUST DELIVER COPIES OF THE MATERIALS TO PLAINTIFFS’ COUNSEL AND DEFENDANTS’ COUNSEL SO THEY ARE RECEIVED NO LATER THAN SEPTEMBER 20, 2023. Counsel’s addresses are:

Counsel for Derivative Plaintiffs:

THE BROWN LAW FIRM, P.C.
Timothy Brown
767 Third Avenue, Suite 2501
New York, NY 10017
Telephone: (516) 922-5427
Email: tbrown@thebrownlawfirm.net
RIGRODSKY LAW, P.A.
Seth D. Rigrodsky
300 Delaware Avenue, Suite 210
Wilmington, DE 19801
Telephone: (302) 295-5310
Email: sdr@rl-legal.com

Counsel for Defendants:

COOLEY LLP
Koji Fukumura
4401 Eastgate Mall
San Diego, CA 92121
Telephone: (858) 550-6008
Email: kfukumura@cooley.com

An objector may file an objection on his, her, or its own or through an attorney hired at his, her, or its own expense. If an objector hires an attorney to represent him, her, or it for the purposes of making such objection, the attorney must serve (either by hand delivery or by first class mail) a notice of appearance on the counsel listed above and file such notice with the Court no later than twenty-one (21) calendar days before the Settlement Hearing. Any Inovio stockholder who does not timely file and serve a written objection complying with the above terms shall be deemed to have waived, and shall be foreclosed from raising, any objection to the Settlement, and any untimely objection shall be barred.

Any objector who files and serves a timely, written objection in accordance with the instructions above, may appear at the Settlement Hearing either in person or through counsel retained at the objector’s expense. Objectors need not attend the Settlement Hearing, however, in order to have their objections considered by the Court.

If you are a Current Inovio Stockholder and do not take steps to appear in this action and object to the proposed Settlement, you will be bound by the Judgment of the Court and will forever be barred from raising an objection to the settlement in the Derivative Actions, and from pursuing any of the Released Claims.

CURRENT INOVIO STOCKHOLDERS AS OF MARCH 31, 2023 WHO HAVE NO OBJECTION TO THE SETTLEMENT DO NOT NEED TO APPEAR AT THE SETTLEMENT HEARING OR TAKE ANY OTHER ACTION.

Interim Stay and Injunction

Pending the Court’s determination as to final approval of the Settlement, Plaintiffs and Plaintiffs’ Counsel, and any Current Inovio Stockholders, derivatively on behalf of Inovio, are barred and enjoined from commencing, prosecuting, instigating, or in any way participating in the commencement or prosecution of any action asserting any Released Claims derivatively against any of the Released Persons in any court or tribunal.

Scope of the Notice

This Notice is a summary description of the Derivative Actions, the Demands, the complaints, the terms of the Settlement, and the Settlement Hearing. For a more detailed statement of the matters involved in the Derivative Actions and the Demands, reference is made to them in the Stipulation and its exhibits, copies of which may be reviewed and downloaded at the investor relations page of the Company’s website, www.inovio.com.

You may obtain further information by contacting Plaintiffs’ Counsel at: Timothy Brown, The Brown Law Firm, P.C., 767 Third Avenue, Suite 2501, New York, NY 10017, Telephone: (516) 922-5427, E-mail: tbrown@thebrownlawfirm.net; or Timothy J. MacFall, Rigrodsky Law, P.A., 825 East Gate Boulevard, Suite 300, Garden City, NY 11530 Telephone: (516) 683-3516, E- mail: tjm@rl-legal.com. Please Do Not Call the Court or Defendants with Questions About the Settlement.

About INOVIO

INOVIO is a biotechnology company focused on developing and commercializing DNA medicines to help treat and protect people from HPV-related diseases, cancer, and infectious diseases. INOVIO’s DNA medicines in development are delivered using its investigational proprietary smart device, CELLECTRA®, to produce immune responses against targeted pathogens and cancers. For more information, visit www.inovio.com.

Contacts

Media: Jennie Willson (267) 429-8567 jennie.willson@inovio.com
Investors: Thomas Hong (267) 440-4298 thomas.hong@inovio.com

1 All capitalized terms used in this notice, unless otherwise defined herein, are defined as set forth in the Stipulation.

Media: Jennie Willson (267) 429-8567 jennie.willson@inovio.com
Investors: Thomas Hong (267) 440-4298 thomas.hong@inovio.com

GlobeNewswire Distribution ID 8863730

Yoon visits Samsung RandD Center in Hanoi

South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol on Saturday visited a Samsung Electronics research and development (RandD) center in Hanoi in a demonstration of his commitment to nurturing talents in science and technology.

The US$220 million facility opened last December, becoming the tech giant’s largest RandD facility in Southeast Asia.

Yoon met with around 50 young digital sector workers from the two countries, which he said have evolved from manufacturing cooperation partners to key research and development partners, according to his office.

He also pledged to actively support the two countries’ joint research to enable the creation of innovative values fusing the two countries’ technologies, and expand the scale of programs strengthening the capabilities of future generations.

Samsung Electronics produces more than 50 percent of the smartphones it sells around the world in Vietnam. The company said a total of 2,200 employees will work at the 16-story RandD center to research and develop software and technologies for mobile phones and other smart and network devices.

The visit to the RandD center was Yoon’s last stop on his three-day state visit to Vietnam before returning home.

Source: Yonhap News Agency

PH soft tennis team resumes training for Asian Games

Fresh off an eight-medal stint in the Nonghyup Bank Korea Cup two days ago, the national soft tennis team will resume practice at the Felicisimo Ampon Tennis Court inside the Rizal Memorial Sports Complex in Manila on Monday. National player Dheo Talatayod said in an interview on Saturday that they have to be well-prepared for the tough 19th Asian Games, slated in Hangzhou, China from Sept. 23 to Oct. 8. The soft tennis competition will be held at the Olympic Tennis Center on Oct. 3-7. “We’ll be back in training,” Talatayod said. The Philippines brought home three bronze medals, including one from the mixed doubles pair of Talatayod and Bien Zoleta, in the main draw of the June 14-21 tournament held at the Yeolwoomul Tennis Center indoor hard courts in Incheon City. The other two came from men’s singles (Joseph Arcilla) and men’s team events (Talatayod, Arcilla, Samuel Nuguit, and Ryan Carpio). In the Challenge Round, the Filipinos secured gold medals in men’s singles (Nuguit), women’s singles (Christy Sañosa), mixed doubles (Virvienica Bejosano and Cambodian John Mada), and women’s team (Zoleta, Princess Catindig, Sañosa, Bejosano, Bea Ebriega), while Catindig got a bronze medal in the mixed doubles with Polish Franciszek Sliwa. In the Cambodia Southeast Asian Games in May, the Philippines claimed three gold medals, courtesy of Arcilla (men’s singles), Zoleta and Catindig (women’s doubles), and the women’s team of Catindig, Bejosano, Fatima Amirul, and Zoleta siblings Bien and Bambi). The squad also added one silver from Bambi Zoleta (women’s singles) and one bronze from the men’s team (Arcilla, Talatayod, Mark Anthony Alcoseba, Nuguit, Adjuthor Moralde, and George Patrick Mendoza). The impressive showing in Cambodia was also aided by a technical exchange program with the Korea Soft Tennis Association, where they trained with the Korea Daegu Bank team at the Rizal Memorial Tennis Center and in Korea for more training sessions. “I’m happy that I was able to achieve my goal of a podium finish at the Korea Cup because I will also compete in the mixed doubles event in the Asian Games,” said Bien Zoleta, a seasoned tennis player before shifting to soft tennis. “It’s my first time to play in the mixed doubles and I won the bronze medal in the Korea Cup, which is like a test event prior to the Asian Games. Most of the players who joined the Korea Cup will also compete in the Asian Games.” At the 18th Asiad in Indonesia in 2018, South Korea (men’s singles and men’s team) and Japan (women’s singles and women’s team) collected two gold medals each while Chinese-Taipei (mixed doubles) had one. The Philippines’ best result was the quartefinal stint of the Arcilla-led men’s team, which lost to Chinese-Taipei. The 19th Asiad was originally scheduled in Sept. 2022 but was reset due to Covid-19 concerns. Coach Divina Escala said the team plans to join a tournament and attend a training camp in Sunchang, South Korea if they will be granted financial support by the Philippine Sports Commission. “June and July is back to strength and conditioning, and endurance phase to prepare their physical condition to a higher phase of August training camp and last tournament before their Asian Games campaign,” said Escala, who is assisted by Michael John Enriquez and Josephine Paguyo.

Source: Philippines News Agency

Richest Pinoys encouraged to invest in ‘Maharlika’

The national government is open to striking joint ventures with the country’s richest Filipinos once the Maharlika Investment Fund (MIF) becomes operational. ‘We’re hopeful. Iyon pong mga conglomerates natin, we can also do some joint ventures, co-investments sa mga infrastructure projects (We can also do some joint ventures with our conglomerates, co-investments in infrastructure projects),’ National Treasurer Rosalia de Leon said in a news forum on Saturday. De Leon, however, assured that the soon-to-be-formed Maharlika Investment Corp. (MIC) would properly evaluate each investment. President Ferdinand R. Marcos Jr. said Thursday that Malacañang would scrutinize the revisions in the MIF bill but promised to sign the measure as soon as he gets it. De Leon said the MIC board of directors would craft investment and risk management strategies where the public could see the possible returns of the projects. ‘Dadaan din po iyan sa very rigorous screening process – ano iyong mga magiging return ng mga projects na iyon, ano bang mga risk. Mayroon ding risk mitigating measures na ia-identify to ensure na mamu-monitor very well and at the same time, adjust all those risks (It will go through a very rigorous screening process – what will be the returns and risks. There are also risk mitigating measures that would be identified to ensure that we can monitor and at the same time adjust all those risks),’ she said. De Leon assured that all projects would go through a procurement process and that the only exemption is on the technical aspect or soliciting technical advice. She, however, said there is no information yet as to what percentage of the proposed sovereign wealth fund would be allocated to infrastructure projects. The Marcos administration has at least 194 flagship infrastructure projects amounting to PHP9 trillion. ‘Dadaan pa rin po tayo sa procurement process. So, doon pa lang po ay makikita natin na talagang marami pong mga pagsusuri at pag-i-evaluate para po iyong pong mga projects, mga investment na papasukin ni Maharlika is already complying – is within the investment strategy po na in-approve po ng board (It will still pass through a procurement process. So, with that alone, we can see that it will be assessed thoroughly and that the investment we will venture into complies with the investment strategy that would be approved by the board),’ she added. To allay fears, she reiterated that social security institutions, such as the GSIS, SSS, Pag-IBIG, and PhilHealth are prohibited from investing in the MIF and the corporation. In addition, no funding for social development projects, such as services, health care, and education would be tapped in the MIF. ‘(D)oon sa Senado, na-emphasize din na iyon pong MIF will really be investing iyong mga sustainable endeavors. So, marami pong improvements na nailagay po doon sa legislation from the Senate version (At the Senate, they emphasized that the MIF will be investing in sustainable endeavors. There are a lot of improvements made in the Senate version),’ de Leon said. ‘(M)ayroon pong iha-hire na external auditor to look also into the operations at financial performance ng MIF plus magri-report sa oversight committee (An external auditor would be hired to also look into the operations and financial performance of the MIF).’ Seven members each from the Senate and House of Representatives would be assigned to the Joint Oversight Committee to monitor the viability and the financial performance of the MIC and the MIF, she said.

Source: Philippines News Agency

Palawan launches app for reporting environmental violations

Environmental authorities last June 20 launched a new mobile application aimed at getting local communities involved in reporting violations against the province’s flora and fauna. Called the Sumbong App, it is now available for download on Google Play and offers Palaweños an easy-to-use interface and a direct reporting channel for reporting environmental violations committed by unscrupulous individuals. In an interview on Saturday, Jovic Fabello, the information officer of the Palawan Council for Sustainable Development (PCSD) Staff, said the app was launched in collaboration with the United States Agency for International Development-Sustainable Interventions for Biodiversity, Oceans, and Landscapes (USAID-SIBOL). The event coincided with the celebration of the 31st anniversary of the Strategic Environmental for Palawan (SEP) law on June 19. The SEP law outlines the province’s environmental objectives, including the protection and enhancement of Palawan’s unique ecosystems, the promotion of sustainable resource use, the preservation of cultural heritage, and the involvement of local communities in environmental decision-making processes. The Sumbong App, according to him, encourages residents to report various violations, such as illegal fishing, wildlife trafficking, and unauthorized tree cutting. Fabello emphasized that the app provides a platform where individuals can report violations without fear of being exposed, ensuring that these issues are addressed promptly. “The public can use the app to report environmental violations, such as illegal fishing, wildlife trafficking, chopping of trees, among others. They won’t be afraid to report the violations that have witnessed because there is now an app that allows this to be done discreetly,” he said in Filipino. Fabello said reports received through the app, developed by Zerobstacle Technologies, a software development and innovative solutions company, will be validated and reviewed for appropriate action. He noted that the active reporting of environmental violations by individuals plays a crucial role in conserving and protecting natural resources. It helps establish accountability, enables data collection, engages communities, and facilitates timely intervention to prevent further damage. The app also features a link to the PCSD Online Permitting System, allowing users to register, apply, and easily track their applications for business transactions, and provides access to important government policies and issuances related to the environment, ensuring that users are well-informed. Levita Lagrada, the director of PCSD Staff, highlighted during the launch the significance of creating a platform that empowers Palaweños to report firsthand issues and violations. By actively reporting violations, individuals become key contributors to environmental safeguarding and the promotion of sustainable practices. “It is crucial to give the public a platform to report issues and violations they have personally witnessed. After all, they are the ones directly affected by the environmental destruction,” she said. Lagrada emphasized that the Sumbong mobile app embodies the principles of digital governance, aiming to address a wide range of challenges affecting Palawan like environmental concerns, social equity, economic sustainability, and other complex issues the province faces.

Source: Philippines News Agency