Australia Upset About Indonesia’s Reduction of Bali Bomber’s Sentence

Australia’s leader said Friday that it’s upsetting Indonesia has further reduced the prison sentence of the bombmaker in the Bali attack that killed 202 people, which could free him within days if he’s granted parole.

The most recent reduction of Umar Patek’s sentence takes his total reductions to almost two years and means he could be released ahead of the 20th anniversary of the bombings in October.

“This will cause further distress to Australians who were the families of victims of the Bali bombings,” Prime Minister Anthony Albanese told Channel 9. “We lost 88 Australian lives in those bombings.”

Albanese said he would continue making “diplomatic representations” to Indonesia about Patek’s sentence and a range of other issues, including Australians currently jailed in Indonesia. Albanese described Patek as “abhorrent.”

“His actions were the actions of a terrorist,” Albanese told Channel 9. “They did have such dreadful results for Australian families that are ongoing, the trauma which is there.”

Indonesia often grants sentence reductions to prisoners on major holidays such as the nation’s Independence Day, which was Wednesday.

Patek received a five-month reduction for good behavior and could walk free this month from Porong Prison in East Java province if he gets parole, said Zaeroji, who heads the provincial office for the Ministry of Law and Human Rights.

Zaeroji, who goes by a single name, said Patek had the same rights as other inmates and had fulfilled legal requirements to receive sentence reductions. “While in the prison, he behaved very well and he regrets his radical past which has harmed society and the country and he has also vowed to be a good citizen,” Zaeroji said.

Patek was arrested in Pakistan in 2011 and tried in Indonesia, where he was convicted in 2012. He was originally sentenced to 20 years’ imprisonment.

With his time served plus sentence reductions, he became eligible for parole August 14. The decision from the Ministry of Law and Human Rights is still pending, Zaeroji said. If refused parole, he could remain jailed until 2029.

Patek was one of several men implicated in the attack, which was widely blamed on Jemaah Islamiyah, a Southeast Asian militant group with ties to al-Qaida. Most of those killed in the bombing on the resort island were foreign tourists.

Another convicted conspirator, Ali Imron, was sentenced to life. Earlier this year, a third militant, Aris Sumarsono, whose real name is Arif Sunarso but is better known as Zulkarnaen, was sentenced to 15 years following his capture in 2020 after 18 years on the run.

Jan Laczynski, a survivor of the bombings, told Channel 9 that many Australians will be “devastated” by Patek’s potential release. “This guy should not be going out unsupervised, unmonitored,” he said.

Source: Voice of America

China’s Expanding Submarine Fleet Makes Experts Worry About Taiwan’s Readiness

Even to laypeople, the odds of a China-versus-Taiwan underwater faceoff seem unbalanced.

China’s submarine force: 66 boats in 2020 with 76 expected by 2030.

Attributes: Nearly silent next-gen tech.

Taiwan’s submarine force: Four boats.

Attributes: Two of the world’s oldest operational subs, all use 20th-century tech.

The experts worry that Taiwan may lack the ability to fend off China without updating its military equipment, given that China has been investing in advanced weaponry and equipment— and overhauling its military command structure to modernize its armed forces as it eyes the war in Ukraine. China’s defense budget in 2022 is $230 billion, the second largest in the world behind the U.S. By contrast, Taiwan’s defense budget is $12.8 billion, 5% of China’s.

The Naval News, the official newspaper of the British Royal Navy, pointed out on Aug. 11 that China’s East Sea Fleet, which carries out operations around Taiwan, acquired a new submarine representing “the cutting edge of Chinese non-nuclear submarines.”

The boat, often referred to as Type 039, was placed to directly oppose the Taiwanese navy. “The East Sea Fleet submarine bases are north of the main Taiwanese Island, about 500 km south. It also faces off against Japan’s island chain,” reported Naval News, adding the boat was commissioned in 2021, and entered operation just over a year later, a very short timeline for a new class of submarine.

Seth Cropsey, founder and president of the defense think tank Yorktown Institute and former deputy undersecretary of the U.S. Navy, told VOA Mandarin that the Type 039 cannot be ignored.

“The submarine, because of its stealth, is well suited to carry out a blockade, or to protect surface ships that are being used for an amphibious assault, or to launch missiles in an invasion,” he said. “So, the submarine is an extremely important weapon platform.”

Michal Thim, a research fellow focusing on Taiwan’s defense policy at the Association for International Affairs in Prague, told VOA Mandarin in an email that it’s impossible to confirm whether China’s latest submarine has been deployed near Taiwan.

“Submarine deployments and movements are among the most closely held secrets in any navy. What is already a long-standing concern for Taiwan, for Japan, and for the U.S. is the speed with which the Chinese navy submarine fleet has expanded,” he said.

Holmes Liao, former adjunct distinguished lecturer at Taiwan’s War College, said that Taiwan’s Ministry of National Defense seldom, if ever, publicizes China People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) submarine activities near Taiwan.

“Given the PLAN’s warplane incursions into Taiwan’s airspace and surface combatants menacing near the 12-nm territorial line, it’s highly likely that the PLA’s submarines have been active near or in Taiwan’s maritime territory,” he wrote in an email to VOA Mandarin.

Liao said the new PLAN submarine is allegedly very quiet and poses a significant threat even to U.S. Navy’s surface assets.

As an example, Liao said, “In 2005, a Swedish submarine Gotland conducted a series of simulated attacks against the newly commissioned Ronald Reagan aircraft carrier battle group. Throughout the exercise, Gotland launched torpedoes on multiple occasions without ever being detected by the U.S. ASW [Anti-submarine Warfare] assets. The episode shows that an advanced submarine can significantly threaten valuable surface combatants.”

The focus on the two submarine fleets comes during a time of heightened tensions between Taiwan, a self-governing island and China, which views Taiwan as its own territory.

Taiwan’s defense ministry Friday said it has detected 17 Chinese aircraft and six Chinese vessels, with eight of those planes flown over the median line of the Taiwan Strait, which in an unofficial barrier between China and Taiwan.

The Chinese military ramped up its tactics earlier this month in reaction to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s Aug. 2 visit. This week, it is conducting daily drills in response to a surprise visit by another U.S. congressional delegation. Sources told Reuters that Chinese navy ships were active off both the east and west coasts of Taiwan.

Taiwan’s vintage subs

According to a report released earlier this year by the Congressional Research Service, China has been steadily modernizing its submarine force and is expected to have 76 boats by 2030.

By contrast, Taiwan has four boats. Two of them are World War II vintage ex-U.S. Navy fleet submarines, the world’s oldest operational submarines.

Richard Stirn, a former submarine technician who worked for the U.S. Navy, said he’s not sure these two ships would still be able to launch weapons. “Taiwan today has four older boats using mid-century tech,” he told VOA Mandarin.

Thim said that the other two are combat vessels that Taiwan acquired in the late 1980s. While all of them underwent substantial upgrading, they are “hardly a deterrent” toward China.

“China, of course, now has around 60 conventional submarines and could use them in many ways to make life in Taiwan difficult. Enforcing [a] naval blockade, attacking surface combat ships, and hunting Taiwanese submarines,” he said.

Taiwan has been trying to build its own submarines, but China has repeatedly prevented other countries from participating in Taiwan’s submarine-building project. However, manufacturers from seven countries, including the U.S. and the U.K, secretly assisted Taiwan in upgrading its own advanced diesel-electric submarines.

Thim said the U.S. provides both expertise and critical technology to Taiwan. “There is definitely room for improvement, the greater involvement of Japan — that makes excellent submarines — is one area that can be improved,” he said.

Liao argued that Taiwan should focus [on] less expensive and more effective defensive weapons. He said Taiwan can deploy [a] Sound Surveillance System (SOSUS) to listen for underwater sounds, particularly submarines, and can pinpoint the coordinates and depth of the intrusion. “To neutralize enemy submarines, smart naval mines and anti-submarine rockets are much more inexpensive and effective than submarines,” he added.

Source: Voice of America

New Law in Vietnam Brings Fines for Recording in Court Without Permission

A new regulation around the coverage of court proceedings could further stifle press freedoms in Vietnam, journalists say.

Under the regulation — known as the Ordinance on Sanctions of Administrative Violations for obstructing procedural activities —journalists who record video or audio of a trial without the consent of the presiding judge risk being fined up to 15 million Vietnamese dong ($640).

The regulation, approved by Vietnam’s National Assembly Standing Committee on Thursday, also makes it illegal for media to record participants in the procedural activities without their consent. The minimum fine for a violation is 7 million Vietnamese dong ($300). The amount is close to the average monthly salary in Vietnam, according to the data company Statista.

When the law goes into effect September 1, journalists will need to seek permission to make recordings of all administrative, civil and criminal courts.

Journalists found in violation of the law will be required to hand over any recordings.

Vietnam’s Deputy Chief of Justice of the Supreme Court Nguyen Tri Tue was cited in state-run media as saying the law is needed to address an increase in violations in court proceedings that make it difficult for judges at work and affects the quality of the hearings and authority of the judiciary.

In Vietnam, journalists have the right to record court hearings under the Press Law. In other countries, media are often banned from filming or photographing court proceedings.

Legal experts, journalists and even some lawmakers have criticized the regulation, saying that penalizing a journalist who records court hearings contradicts other laws and hinders the media’s right to work.

Nguyen Cong Phu, former deputy chief of the Economic Court of the People’s Court of Ho Chi Minh City, was quoted in state media saying that sometimes journalists don’t publish the recordings but instead use the audio or footage as a record if someone contradicts their reporting.

Ha Huy Son, a lawyer who defends bloggers and activists in courts, told VOA no restrictions should be in place if a trial is public.

“[Journalists] need to make audio and video recordings to defend themselves in case there are lawsuits against them,” said Son. “This regulation poses a challenge for them.”

Vo Van Tao, who has 15 years’ experience working for state-owned newspapers, told VOA that he sees shortcomings in the new regulation.

“In the press law, it is stated that the rights and responsibilities of journalists, and the press in general, are to investigate and clarify issues of concern for the society,” said Tao. “If a law attributes journalists who tape-record court sessions to a crime, then I think there is something wrong with that.”

As well as working in journalism, Tao has 10 years of experience as a people’s juror at the People’s Court in central Nha Trang.

Chief Justice of the Supreme People’s Court Nguyen Hoa Binh has argued that while journalists have rights, “the law is to protect people’s privacy.”

National Assembly member Luu Binh Nhuong is among those opposed to the regulation. He was quoted by the Vietnamese media outlet VnExpress as saying that unless trials involve state secrets, military secrets or sexual assault cases, it is unnecessary to limit audio and video recording.

As for public trials, he said he believes journalists are entitled to their rights in accordance with the Press Law.

At public hearings, media often act as an independent observer of proceedings. But if “journalists are not allowed by the jury to make audio or video recordings, there is no evidence to prove the truth to their published article,” said Nhuong.

In many public trials of journalists or human rights activists, family members of the defendants are not allowed to attend, according to Tao.

At the August 16 appeal hearing for Le Van Dung, the journalist’s wife was not allowed to attend the public trial, Dung’s lawyer, Dang Dinh Manh, told VOA.

Dung’s appeal of a five-year sentence for “anti-state” charges was denied by the Hanoi Court.

Tao said the new regulation will “strangle more press rights” in the country where traditional media are closely controlled by the single party.

“Regulations that hinder journalists from practicing will expose the society to untrue information, and that will only be detrimental to the society,” said Tao.

In many cases, independent bloggers and journalists are the only source of freely reported news, according to media watchdog Reporters Without Borders.

The New York-based Committee to Protect Journalists also notes that Vietnam is the fourth-worst jailer of journalists globally, with 23 detained for their work at the time of CPJ’s 2021 prison census.

Vietnam’s Foreign Ministry, however, has repeatedly said the country does have press freedom.

Source: Voice of America

POLICE INVESTIGATE 325 SCAMMERS AND MONEY MULES IN ISLAND-WIDE ENFORCEMENT OPERATION

Officers from the Commercial Affairs Department and the seven Police Land Divisions conducted a two-week operation between 5 and 18 August 2022. A total of 226 men and 99 women, aged between 16 and 73, are currently assisting in investigations for their suspected involvement in scams as scammers or money mules. The suspects are believed to be involved in more than 943 cases of scams, comprising mainly internet love scams, Government and China Officials impersonation scams, e-commerce scams, phishing scams, investment scams, job scams and loan scams, where victims lost over $8.9 million.

The suspects are being investigated for the alleged offences of cheating, money laundering or providing payment services without a licence. The offence of cheating under Section 420 of the Penal Code 1871 carries an imprisonment term of up to 10 years and a fine. The offence of money laundering under the Corruption, Drug Trafficking and Other Serious Crimes (Confiscation of Benefits) Act 1992 carries an imprisonment term not exceeding 10 years, a fine not exceeding $500,000, or both. The offence of carrying on a business to provide any type of payment service in Singapore without a licence under Section 5 of the Payment Services Act 2019 carries a fine not exceeding $125,000, an imprisonment term not exceeding three years, or both.

The Police take a firm stance against any person who may be involved in scams, and perpetrators will be dealt with in accordance with the law. To avoid being an accomplice to crimes, members of the public should always reject requests by others to use your bank account or mobile lines as you will be held accountable if these are linked to crimes.

For more information on scams, members of the public can visit www.scamalert.sg or call the Anti-Scam Hotline at 1800-722-6688. Anyone with information on such scams may call the Police Hotline at 1800-255-0000 or submit information online at www.police.gov.sg/iwitness. All information will be kept strictly confidential.

Source: Singapore Police Force

Malaysian Carmaker Proton Inked Deal To Sell Electric Vehicles

KUALA LUMPUR– Malaysian national carmaker, Proton, signed a general distributorship agreement with smart Automobile Co., Ltd., to sell electric vehicles (EVs) and provide services in Malaysia and Thailand.

At a ceremony, witnessed by officials from various government agencies yesterday, both sides paved the way for the introduction of new energy vehicles, the national carmaker said, in a statement.

The first smart model to be sold by Proton, during the first phase of the collaboration, will be launched in the fourth quarter of 2023, the statement said.

Proton CEO Li Chunrong said, the agreement marked a big step for the carmaker’s entry into the new energy vehicle market.

The first phase of business is focused on retailing, but it provides Proton with valuable knowledge and experience on, not only how to service and charge EVs, but also how to transform the way Proton interacts with their customers, said Li.

“The move into this market segment will also help drive Proton’s move towards being more environmentally friendly, in all facets of our operations, as we work to help Malaysia achieve its carbon neutrality target by 2050,” he said.

Proton works closely with Chinese automaker, Zhejiang Geely Holding Group. Their collaboration brought the popular X70 and X50 Sports Utility Vehicles (SUVs) into the Malaysian market.

Source: Nam News Network

Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Iran Agree To Simplify International Freight Traffic Regime

TASHKENT, Aug 19 (NNN-INA) – Uzbekistan agreed with Iran and Turkmenistan, to simplify the regime of international freight traffic to Turkish and Iranian seaports, the Uzbek Ministry of Transport said, yesterday.

Transport ministries of Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan agreed to organise intermodal transportation to Türkiye, along the Uzbekistan-Turkmenistan-Iran corridor, and reduce fees for road transport, said the ministry.

In addition, Uzbek drivers will be able to obtain a Turkmen visa, in a simplified manner, it said.

The agreement with Iran envisages organising road freight transportation from the Iranian port of Chabahar to Uzbekistan, as well as, through Uzbekistan, along the China-Europe route, the Uzbek ministry said.

Landlocked Uzbekistan has been promoting transit transportation projects through its neighbours, including the war-torn Afghan territory, since the Taliban came back to power, to reach seaports of Pakistan, both by road and railway links.

Source: Nam News Network