Lao dam collapse survivors still wait for new homes amid construction delays

Lao villagers displaced by the country’s worst-ever dam collapse more than three years ago are still waiting for permanent homes promised by the end of this year, with setbacks blamed on poor planning and inadequate numbers of workers, Lao sources say.

The building of 700 new homes for survivors of the July 23, 2018 disaster at the Xe Pian Xe Namnoy dam is still not complete, said an official of Attapeu province, where flooding from the dam’s collapse wiped out all or part of 19 villages, leaving 71 people dead and displacing 14,400 others.

”There has been some progress, but the construction was delayed because only a few carpenters and masons were working,” the official told RFA on Dec. 20, speaking on condition of anonymity in order to speak freely.

“Other carpenters and masons weren’t paid, and if they didn’t get paid they wouldn’t come to work,” he said.

Another reason for the delays is that the Vanseng Company, hired in May 2020 on a bid of U.S. $24.5 million, is the only company performing the work, the official said. “If our authorities wanted to finish construction of all 700 homes on time, they should have hired at least three companies, employing more carpenters and masons.”

The COVID-19 pandemic in Laos and neighboring countries has also led to border closures, and some of the materials needed for construction can’t be brought in from Thailand, the official added.

“At this rate, I think that all 700 homes will be built sometime in 2022 or even 2023 because of the delays,” he said.

Flood survivors still housed in temporary shelters face difficult living conditions as they wait for their promised homes to be built, some said.

“Our family has not been able to move into our new home yet,” said one woman, speaking to RFA on Dec. 20. “My husband keeps an eye on the construction, but the house is not yet complete. Some homes have only had their foundations laid.”

“We’ve complained to authorities about the delays, but they just say this and that and don’t do anything about it,” she said.

Another survivor said that COVID fears had slowed construction of the homes. “About four months ago, I saw a lot of workers building the homes, but all of a sudden they stopped because of COVID-19, and after that only a few of the workers were still working,” he said.

Water shortages are now another problem for the villagers housed in temporary shelters, he said.

“The water supply system is being built but is not yet complete, and we don’t have enough water, especially during the dry season. This making our lives much more difficult,” he said.

Also speaking to RFA, a member of a civil society organization working with authorities on behalf of the survivors said that living conditions have not improved for those still waiting for new homes to be built.

“We want the authorities to speed up construction of the permanent homes so that the survivors can live normal lives again,” he said.

Laos has built dozens of hydropower dams on the Mekong and its tributaries, with ultimate plans to build scores more in a bid to boost the country’s economy. But the projects are controversial because of their environmental impact, displacement of villagers without adequate compensation, and questionable financial and power demand arrangements.

Reported and translated by Max Avary for RFA’s Lao Service. Written in English by Richard Finney.

Philips receives FDA De Novo Clearance for IVC Filter Removal Laser Sheath – CavaClear – with Breakthrough Device Designation

December 22, 2021

  • Philips IVC Filter Removal Laser Sheath – CavaClear – is intended to safely ablate tissue to remove embedded IVC filters
  • CavaClear is a first-in-class FDA-cleared solution for advanced IVC filter removal
  • It is estimated that in the United States more than one million patients with IVC filters would benefit from filter removal to reduce the risk of long-term complications [1,2]
  • Two independent and prospective clinical studies demonstrated that laser-assisted retrieval was 96-99.4% effective with a major adverse event rate of 0.7-2% [3,4]

Amsterdam, the Netherlands – Royal Philips (NYSE: PHG, AEX: PHIA), a global leader in health technology today announced the FDA has granted De Novo Clearance for Philips IVC Filter Removal Laser Sheath – CavaClear – to remove an IVC filter when previous methods of removal have failed. CavaClear is the first and only FDA-cleared solution for advanced IVC filter removal. Earlier in 2021, the FDA granted the device Breakthrough Device Designation. Laser has been clinically proven to provide a success rate over 99%, with low complication rates [3].

IVC filters are used to treat patients with venous thromboembolism, in which blood clots form in the deep veins of the leg and groin, and can travel through the circulatory system. They are placed in the inferior vena cava to capture blood clots from moving to the lungs. However, research has shown that IVC filters may have long-term complications [5]. The filters can fracture and travel through the bloodstream to other parts of the body. Other identified long-term risks associated with IVC filters include lower limb deep vein thrombosis and IVC occlusion. The FDA recommends that implanting physicians consider removing retrievable IVC filters as soon as they are no longer indicated [2].

Failure rates for IVC filter removal can be high and prior to CavaClear, limited options for removal existed if the filter became difficult to remove. Advanced retrieval tools and techniques are required if the IVC filter becomes embedded in the vasculature. Physicians previously had very few tools to remove the filter when complications occurred and until now there were no FDA-approved devices for this type of advanced removal.

“Today is a historic day. With the approval of CavaClear, physicians now have a device specifically geared remove chronically embedded IVC filters,” said Kush R. Desai MD, FSIR, Associate Professor of Radiology, Surgery, and Medicine, and Director of Deep Venous Interventions at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA. “Backed by evidence, this technology can be applied to retrieve IVC filters that are no longer indicated, reducing potential clinical risk for patients and satisfying the FDA’s guidance to retrieve filters when they are no longer indicated.”

Clinical research supports laser-assisted removal

Two independent and prospective clinical studies demonstrated that laser-assisted retrieval was 96-99.4% effective with a major adverse event rate of 0.7-2% [3,4]. Philips CavaClear uses circumferential tissue ablation that can aid in capturing the filter within seconds of laser activation, which can help increase physician efficiency during removal, and may help lower costs by reducing the number of retrieval attempts needed to remove an embedded filter. In addition, the simple and safe design is easy for physicians to integrate into their workflow.

“With the FDA’s clearance of our IVC Filter Removal Laser Sheath – CavaClear – more than one million patients and their physicians now have access to a safe, effective and efficient option for advanced IVC filter removal,” said Chris Landon, Senior Vice President and General Manager Image Guided Therapy Devices at Philips. “This clearance demonstrates the commitment of Philips to innovating procedures with physician collaboration to meet unmet needs that can have a critical impact on the lives of patients and their families.”

[1] Philips internal market research data calculation.
[2] Health, C. for D. and R. Safety Communications – Removing Retrievable Inferior Vena Cava Filters: FDA Safety Communication. (2014).
[3] Kuo, W. et al. Laser‐Assisted Removal of Embedded Vena Cava Filters: A First‐In‐Human Escalation Trial in 500 Patients Refractory to High‐Force Retrieval. Journal of the American Heart Association 9:24, 1-9 (2020).
[4] Desai, K. et al. Excimer Laser Sheath-Assisted Retrieval of “Closed-Cell” Design Inferior Vena Cava Filters. J Am Heart Assoc; 9: e017240 (2020).
[5] Van Ha, T. G. Complications of inferior vena caval filters. Semin. Interv. Radiol. 23, 150–155 (2006).

For further information, please contact:

Joost Maltha
Philips Global Press Office
Tel: +31 6 10 55 8116
Email: joost.maltha@philips.com

Fabienne van der Feer
Philips Image Guided Therapy
Tel: + 31 622 698 001
E-mail: fabienne.van.der.feer@philips.com

About Royal Philips
Royal Philips (NYSE: PHG, AEX: PHIA) is a leading health technology company focused on improving people’s health and well-being, and enabling better outcomes across the health continuum – from healthy living and prevention, to diagnosis, treatment and home care. Philips leverages advanced technology and deep clinical and consumer insights to deliver integrated solutions. Headquartered in the Netherlands, the company is a leader in diagnostic imaging, image-guided therapy, patient monitoring and health informatics, as well as in consumer health and home care. Philips generated 2020 sales of EUR 17.3 billion and employs approximately 78,000 employees with sales and services in more than 100 countries. News about Philips can be found at www.philips.com/newscenter.

Attachments

One Person Killed in Landslide at Myanmar Jade Mine

At least one person is confirmed dead and 70 others missing after a landslide Wednesday at a jade mine in northern Myanmar Wednesday.

The disaster occurred before dawn in the Hpakant area of Kachin state, the heart of the country’s jade industry. Rescue workers say the landslide swept away dozens of workers into a nearby lake.

The French news agency AFP said a member of the rescue team confirmed that 25 people have been injured and hospitalized.

Landslides are a common occurrence for Myanmar’s lucrative but poorly-regulated jade mining industry, which employs migrants and workers from across Myanmar to dig for the precioius gems that are sold across the border in China. Hundreds of miners were killed last year when a landslide triggered a massive landslide in Hpakant.

The government of Aung San Suu Kyi began efforts to reform the jade mining industry, but those efforts came to a halt when the military took power in the February 1, 2021 coup.

 

Source: Voice of America

Prosecutors Push for Life Sentences in Downing of Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17

Dutch prosecutors have demanded life sentences for four suspects on trial for the 2014 downing of a Malaysia Airlines flight over eastern Ukraine that killed 298 people.

 

The prosecution closed three days of final arguments Wednesday by saying Russians Igor Girkin, Sergey Dubinskiy and Igor Pulatov, along with Ukrainian Leonid Kharchenko, collaborated to get a Buk missile system from Russia to support separatists in Ukraine.

An international investigation in 2018 concluded a missile launcher used to shoot down Malaysia Airlines flight MH17 came from Russia’s 53rd Anti-Aircraft Missile Brigade.

 

Prosecutors said the missile was brought to its launch site “by orders of and under guidance of the suspects.”

 

Most of those on board the plane were Dutch nationals, and the Netherlands holds Russia responsible for the downing of the aircraft.Russia has denied any involvement.

 

All of the suspects are being tried in absentia. Only Pulatov has legal representation at the proceedings, and his lawyers are expected to give their closing arguments in March.

 

A verdict in the trial is not expected until late next year.

 

Source: Voice of America

China’s Zero COVID Strategy Braces for Omicron

On Jan 5, 2020, the WHO first reported to the world that cases with “pneumonia of unknown cause in Wuhan City” were reported to it on Dec 31.

Two years into the COVID-19 pandemic, nations are looking for ways to coexist with the COVID-19 pathogen without shutting down their economies again with lockdowns The United States reopened its borders in November. Britain has eased testing and quarantine requirements for vaccinated arrivals.

Even countries that once had strict COVID-19 control measures, such as Australia, New Zealand and Singapore, have all dropped their goal of zero cases. Instead, most countries are trying to prevent their health care systems from becoming stretched to the breaking point while allowing their citizens to live semi-normal lifestyles.

But there’s an outlier: China.

China is the last country still holding onto a strict zero tolerance policy. Over the past two years, Chinese authorities say they have contained more than 30 COVID-19 outbreaks, including ones caused by the more contagious delta variant of the coronavirus. Strict health care measures help keep the infection at bay, including mass testing, snap lockdowns and extensive quarantines.

A recent outbreak in China’s Zhejiang province, a major industrial and export hub on the country’s east coast, left more than half a million people in quarantine, hundreds of factories shut down, and most flights out of provincial capital Hangzhou canceled. In November, Shanghai closed Disneyland, banning anyone inside from leaving while officials performed more than 100,000 COVID-19 tests after a single positive case.

With the emergence of more contagious varieties, such as the delta and the new omicron strain of the coronavirus, Beijing seems to be doubling down its effort to contain any sporadic outbreaks.

“You have to give China a lot of credit for keeping COVID so low for two years, but now I think we have passed the point where we can expect to prevent cases because it’s simply so transmissible, and eventually China is going to have to open up to the world,” Lawrence Gostin, a professor of global health law at Washington’s Georgetown University and the director of the World Health Organization Collaborating Center on National and Global Health Law, told VOA.

The omicron variant

Experts pointed out that rigid disease control measures will be unsustainable to maintain as more contiguous variants appear across the globe.

The new omicron variant has been detected in at least 89 countries since it was first discovered in South Africain November. Health officials say the strain may be much more transmissible than delta and more resistant to COVID-19 vaccines.

“In fact, the omicron variant might be one of the most infectious pathogens on the planet. So, I don’t think it’s sustainable for China to expect to have zero tolerance for cases because it’s only a matter of time before China is overwhelmed with cases,” Gostin told VOA.

 

A recent study by a team from the University of Hong Kong found the omicron variant multiplies 70 times faster in the human bronchial tubes than the delta variant, leading to faster transmission among humans than previous versions.

 

Delta is already believed to be more than twice as contagious as previous variants, according to the Yale School of Medicine.

 

Chen Xi, an associate professor of health policy and economics at the Yale School of Public Health, pointed out that China has shifted from a zero-tolerance policy to a “dynamic” zero tolerance policy, meaning that the country acknowledges it is impossible to keep the case number to zero.

 

Yet according to Chen, Beijing is unlikely to relax its strict COVID-19 policies anytime soon.

 

“China’s approach now is ‘wait and see.’ There are two major events in China in 2022: the Winter Olympics and the 20th National Congress. So, China does not want to make a move right now that might cause any disruption in its society,” Chen told VOA.

Analysts believe Chinese President Xi Jinping will secure a third five-year term at the 20th National Party Congress scheduled for the final months of 2022.

 

One reason for China’s extreme caution on COVID-19 transmissions is the number of hospital beds in the country. According to data from Forbes, China has 3.6 ICU beds per 100,00 patients. Meanwhile, that number for the U.S. is 34.7 and 29.2 for Germany.

 

“China’s medical capacity is insufficient if there’s a large outbreak. For example, the number of nurses per 1,000 people in China is about one-seventh that of the U.S., and the United States is already in short supply of nurses,” Chen added.

 

The high financial cost

 

Government data released last week showed retail sales struggled and investment continued to weaken, suggesting that more frequent outbreaks and lockdowns are taking their toll on the economy.

 

For example, the recent lockdown in Zhejiang Province, a major manufacturing hub that accounts for 6% of China’s total economy, is “triggering local restrictions and factory shutdowns… further supply chain disruption is a significant possibility,” analysts from London-based Capital Economics wrote in a research note last week, according to CNN.

Chen from the Yale School of Public Health pointed out that apart from economic costs, there are costs related to China’s communication with other parties of the world.

 

“We see that many pandemics eventually lead to wars, and that’s because these pandemics hinder communication,” he said. “I think the zero-tolerance policy has a negative effect on Sino-U.S. and Sino-EU relations particularly.”

 

“It’s not just China,” said Huang Yanzhong, a senior Fellow for global health at the Council on Foreign Relations. “The pandemic is limiting the movement of people; it also limits the effective communication and exchange of ideas.”

 

Huang added, “And that is contributing to all this disinformation, misinformation and conspiracy theories.”

 

Other experts argued that China’s zero tolerance policy might give the country a geopolitical advantage for the long term. Raina MacIntyre is a professor at the University of New South Wales in Sydney and a principal research Fellow at Australia’s National Health and Medical Research Council. She leads a research program on the prevention and control of infectious diseases.

“The virus attacks the heart, the lungs and even causes neurocognitive damage. We have not even begun to appreciate the population level burden of chronic disease, cognitive impairment and organ damage that countries with a large burden of disease will be living with,” MacIntyre told VOA.

 

She said if China keeps the infection largely under control, its population will be fit and healthy into the future, “while the U.S. and Europe will be groaning under an unprecedented burden of chronic disease and even generational burden from potential long-term effects on children,” she added.

 

Exit strategy

 

While China’s strategy at the moment is to suppress transmission as long as there remains significant transmission globally, experts pointed out some of the costs will accumulate and create a different set of incentives for the country.

 

“Unfortunately, most experts expect widespread transmission of COVID-19 into 2023, and there are plenty of plausible scenarios in which it could last further. Most experts also expect COVID-19 to eventually become endemic,” Thomas Hale, a professor of global public health policy at the University of Oxford, told VOA.

 

He said that all governments, China included, will need to develop plans for how to manage this disease on an ongoing basis.

 

“For an endemic disease, it is very difficult to define success as near zero transmission,” he continued, adding that a better metric will be the overall health impact of the disease. He said governments will rely on a mix of vaccines, treatments, increased health care capacity, and containment measures to keep the health impact low.

 

 

Source: Voice of America

Seoul’s Peace Initiative at Odds with Biden’s Coalition-Building Strategy

South Korea’s efforts to revive diplomacy with North Korea stand at odds with the Biden administration’s strategy of building an international coalition to counter the dual threats posed by North Korea and China, experts say.

 

Nearing the end of his presidency in May 2022, South Korean President Moon Jae-in has been accelerating his peace initiative to reengage with Pyongyang. The effort comes amid long-deadlocked nuclear talks between Washington and Pyongyang as well as a stalled inter-Korean dialogue.

 

To revive talks, the Moon government has been pushing a declaration formally ending the Korean War of the early 1950s. Such a declaration would need the support of the U.S. and China, two nations engaged in intense rivalry.

 

The Moon government considers “making a political declaration of ending the war a starting point for peace negotiations,” according to the South Korean Foreign Ministry’s website.

 

Ken Gause, director of the Adversary Analytics Program at CNA, said Seoul’s drive to gain China’s support for the declaration contributed, in part, to its decision not to boycott the Beijing Winter Olympics.

 

“The Olympics would give them an opportunity to have some private conversations with the Chinese to find out how much [Beijing is] willing to play a role in helping to get North Korea and South Korea together, at least some sort of inter-Korean dialogue,” Gause said.

 

Seoul is “not considering” a diplomatic boycott of the Beijing Winter Olympics, Moon said last week at a press conference held after a bilateral summit with Australia. The U.S. and several other nations are withholding diplomatic entourages from the Games to protest China’s human rights abuses.

 

Seoul’s peace initiative

 

Moon also said the U.S., China, and North Korea agree “in principle” to declare a formal end to the Korean War.

 

Yet the Biden administration continues to take a tough stance toward Pyongyang. Earlier this month, the U.S. Treasury Department issued a set of sanctions on North Korea-related entities and individuals for violating human rights.

 

The Biden administration has said it will conduct its foreign policy “centered on the defense of democracy and the protection of human rights.”

 

U.S.-led efforts to counter Chinese influence and draw attention to Beijing’s human rights record are also a complicating factor.

 

South Korea’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs told VOA’s Korean Service last week that Seoul “is well aware of the international community’s concerns and related discussions on the human rights issues in China.”

 

The ministry continued, “Recognizing that human rights and democracy are important universal values, the Korean government is communicating with the international community and China, voicing its opinion in an appropriate way.”

 

US-ROK diversion

 

Robert King, who served as special envoy for North Korea human rights issues during the Obama administration, said when it comes to human rights, “South Korea is essentially in the same place as the United States.”

 

King continued, however, that the difference in their approach to human rights stems from Seoul’s priority toward “engagement with the North” to revive its peace initiative, giving less attention to human rights violations of the regime, whereas “the United States has focused more on issues of denuclearization and human rights” over inter-Korean engagements and dialogue.

 

In December 2020, Seoul passed a law banning the dispersal of leaflets and other materials into North Korea.

 

The measure sparked concern in Washington that it could undermine international efforts to provide outside information to the people of North Korea.

 

The State Department told VOA’s Korean Service in May that the U.S. “continues to promote the free flow of information into, out of, and within the DPRK.”

 

In response to the State Department’s statement supporting the free flow of information into North Korea, the South Korean foreign ministry said, “The ROK government believes that it is important that North Koreans have access to information, and that it is necessary to bring about positive changes to North Korean society by promoting access to information.”

 

Gary Samore, former White House coordinator for arms control and weapons of mass destruction during the Obama administration, said Seoul’s overall relations with Washington have been “extremely good” and “cooperative within the limits of its overall position in the region including its relations with China.”

 

Samore continued, “In the case of South Korea, it wants to work with China on the North Korean threat. And therefore, it has a different relationship with China than others.”

 

Joseph DeTrani, who served as special envoy for six-party denuclearization talks with Pyongyang during the George W. Bush administration, said, “I think the U.S. appreciates the difficult position South Korea is in and respects their decision knowing that they are living in that neighborhood and dealing with a great power that’s the People’s Republic of China.”

 

 

Source: Voice of America