UK Scholar Sounds Alarm Over Chinese Legal Expert Targeted by Beijing

A U.K.-based China scholar has spoken out in support of former Tsinghua University law scholar Xu Zhangrun, who is believed to be under house arrest at his Beijing home, under the constant gaze of surveillance cameras.

Kerry Brown, professor of Chinese Studies and director of the Lau China Institute at King’s College, London, wrote that while Xu is technically “at liberty,” he has paid a heavy price for his criticism of China’s political and judicial system under the ruling Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and general secretary Xi Jinping.

Authorities in Beijing detained Xu on the morning of July 6, 2020 on allegations of “seeking out prostitutes” after he called online for political reforms.

He was released a week later, but later told the media that he had been fired from his teaching post and subjected to public sanctions for “moral corruption” by Tsinghua University’s law school.

Charges of “seeking out prostitutes” have been used before by the Chinese authorities to target peaceful critics and activists, or anyone who runs afoul of local officials and powerful vested interests. Xu has lodged a legal challenge, and denies the charges.

Xu had penned a 10,000-word essay dated May 21, 2020, in which he hit out at Xi Jinping for “isolating” China from the international community with his foreign policy.

The essay called for China’s leaders to be held politically accountable, for the release of prisoners of conscience including journalists and human rights lawyers, and for an end to the political targeting of academics.

Xu has also called for constitutional amendments passed in 2018 that allow indefinite rule by Xi to be revoked, and for legislation requiring officials to publish details of their assets and financial interests.

“These are dark days for anyone who takes a dissenting position in China,” Brown wrote in a recent commentary on an edition of Xu’s letters for Australia’s Inside Story website.

“We see from these letters, which were written last July and August to supporters and the Fairbank Center at Harvard University … this is a marginal existence.”

Xu’s “Ten Letters from a Plague Year” was published in Chinese earlier this year, and is currently being translated by Geremie Barmé for China Heritage.

‘A spectral existence’

“With no job or livelihood, he seems to occupy a kind of spectral existence,” Brown wrote, quoting one of Xu’s letters in the commentary.

“China’s present totalitarian order has imposed a regime of censorship the likes of which has never been seen before,” Xu writes.

“Under it, editing has become a particularly fraught occupation and shepherding anything through to publication a hazardous process.”

“Everyone involved in the industry is hesitant. Authors feel that they are treading on thin ice,” writes Xu, who also described living under surveillance cameras at his Beijing home in a December 2020 essay.

Brown added: “[Xu] is able to observe the public world even though he is denied a voice in it. He watches debates online but isn’t allowed to participate … This seems to be the kind of purgatory the party wants to consign problematic figures to.”

“With Xi Jinping and his colleagues having defined a form of nationalism and patriotic fervor so potent it intoxicates a swathe of the public, someone like Xu resembles the sole sober person at a drunken party,” Brown wrote.

Brown also highlighted the plight of veteran literary figure Geng Xiaonan, who was sentenced to three years’ imprisonment for “illegal business operations” by a Beijing court in February 2021 after she expressed public support for Xu.

Geng and Qin were detained on Sept. 9, 2020 on suspicion of “illegal business operations,” and formally arrested a month later.

Xu Zhangrun also called for the couple’s release, saying in an open letter that “illegal business operations” is a blanket charge used to target people for political reasons, and has been arbitrarily applied to Geng and her husband.

Translated and edited by Luisetta Mudie.

Chinese Official Dismisses Wave of Emigration From Hong Kong

A ruling Chinese Communist Party (CCP) official in charge of Hong Kong on Wednesday dismissed a wave of emigration from the city in the wake of a crackdown on dissent under Beijing’s national security law.

Huang Liuquan, deputy director of the Hong Kong and Macao Affairs Office under China’s State Council, said young people in the city are “full of confidence about a bright future.”

“I have noticed a different atmosphere now that the [Hong Kong government] is taking aggressive action, and I have felt a sense of positive energy from all kinds of patriotic people,” Huang told journalists after meeting with a youth organization to explain the CCP’s 14th Five Year Plan.

Huang was responding to media questions about an ongoing exodus of people from the city since the national security law took effect.

Hong Kong’s population fell by 1.2 percent in the past 12 months, amid an ongoing exodus of people in the wake of a draconian national security law imposed on the city by the CCP from July 1, 2020.

Government statistics showed the city’s population fell by just over 87,000, to 7,394,700, as hundreds, sometimes thousands, of net departures continued to be recorded every day during the past few months.

Total net departures were recorded at 89,200 for the same period.

The previous year’s figures also showed a decline of 1.2 percent.

Net daily departures have regularly reached 2,000 ahead of key visa deadlines for the United Kingdom, with net arrivals rarely reported since the national security law criminalized public criticism of the government, political opposition and other forms of activism.

“Some people think that this is because of the implementation of the national security law in Hong Kong, and that they have lost confidence, but I don’t think that is correct,” Huang said.

He promised further economic measures to support work and educational exchanges for young Hongkongers in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area.

‘Starting to panic’

But people leaving Hong Kong for good, many of them young families, have repeatedly told RFA that their motivation was largely political.

“Anyone saying that this has nothing to do with the national security law or the political climate is under a misconception,” a former Hong Kong resident who gave only the nickname Michael told RFA.

“More than 40 democrats were arrested on totally unwarranted charges just for taking part in a primary election.”

“I was starting to panic, just staying there, and the national security law was definitely a factor that hastened my decision [to emigrate],” he said.

A fourth-year journalism student who gave only the nickname Ryan said the greater economic opportunities promised to young Hongkongers in neighboring mainland Chinese cities won’t replace what has been lost.

“They have done too many things to discourage young people: they have cracked down on universities, derecognized student unions, gotten rid of professors, and eroded Hong Kong’s academic freedom and freedom of speech,” Ryan said.

“How could I possibly hope for a better future in the Greater Bay Area?”

No confidence in the future

Joseph Cheng, former politics lecturer at Hong Kong’s City University, said the latest population statistics were “alarming.”

“Neither Beijing nor Hong Kong officials are willing to admit that there is a crisis in Hong Kong,” Cheng said. “Hong Kong residents lack confidence in the future and can’t tolerate the current situation, so a considerable number of people are choosing to emigrate.”

“I think the central government must care about that, because it will affect how its policies in Hong Kong are perceived in the international community,” he said.

Cheng, who has himself recently emigrated, said the feelings of the people of Hong Kong are no longer being taken into account by Beijing.

Meanwhile, Hong Kong’s Law Society elected a board of candidates with links to Beijing’s Central Liaison Office in Hong Kong, after former candidate Jonathan Ross withdrew from elections to the society’s leadership citing intimidation against himself and his family.

Ross’ withdrawal came after warnings from the pro-CCP media and Hong Kong leader Carrie Lam that the society should stay out of politics or disband.

Jimmy Chan, Tom Fu, Justin Yuen, Ronald Sum, and incumbent Careen Wong all warned during their campaigns that the society should become “politicized.”

All have said they have ties to the Central Liaison Office, government broadcaster RTHK reported.

Translated and edited by Luisetta Mudie.

Indonesia – Floods, update (BMKG, ADINet) (ECHO Daily Flash of 25 August 2021)

Widespread floods triggered by heavy rain continue to affect several parts of Indonesia over the past few days, leading to casualties and damage.

 

According to the ASEAN Disaster Information Network (ADInet), in Sumatra island, at least 4,200 people have been affected, 2,935 in Medan City (North Sumatra Province) and 1,255 in East Aceh Regency (Aceh Province). In Kalimantan Island, more than 750 people have been affected and 40 displaced across the Regencies of Seruyan and West Kotawaringin (Central Kalimantan Province).

 

On 25-26 August, light to moderate rain with thunderstorms is expected over most parts of the affected Provinces.

 

 

Source: European Commission’s Directorate-General for European Civil Protection and Humanitarian Aid Operations

Thailand – Flood (ADInet, TMD) (ECHO Daily Flash of 25 August 2021)

  • On 24 August, heavy rain caused floods across Pong District (Phayao Province, northern Thailand).
  • According to the ASEAN Disaster Information Network (ADInet), up to 550 people have been affected and 110 houses were damaged or destroyed.
  • Moderate rain with thunderstorms is forecast over most of Phayao Province on 25-26 August.

 

 

Source: European Commission’s Directorate-General for European Civil Protection and Humanitarian Aid Operations

DFA-OVS REMINDS OVERSEAS FILIPINOS OF VOTER REGISTRATION DEADLINE

PASAY CITY 25 August 2021  –  The Department of Foreign Affairs – Overseas Voting Secretariat (DFA-OVS) reminds all overseas Filipinos that the deadline for transferring overseas voter records back to the Philippines is on 31 August 2021.

 

Meanwhile, Filipinos who will be abroad from 10 April to 09 May 2022 are encouraged to register as overseas voters before the 30 September 2021 registration deadline.

 

Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, Filipinos who are experiencing difficulties travelling to the nearest Philippine Embassy or Consulate for voter registration or any voter record concerns may avail of the COMELEC-Office for Overseas Voting’s (OFOV) Virtual Frontline Services (VFS), a voter registration service that does not require the physical presence of the applicant.  The VFS, however, pertains only to transactions where the applicant has existing voter registration records with complete biometric data, such as:

 

Certification as an overseas voter (for those who are registered voters in the Philippines and are now applying to vote abroad);

Reactivation of Overseas Voter Registration Records (for those who failed to vote consecutively in the past two national elections);

Updating of addresses and contact information; and

Transfer of voting records between different international locations, and from overseas back to the Philippines.

Interested VFS applicants can fill up their application form (OVF-1) by using the i-Rehistro system on COMELEC’s website https://irehistro.comelec.gov.ph/irehistro/ovf1 and submit the scanned copy of their duly accomplished OVF-1 to COMELEC-OFOV:

 

by sending an email to concerns@comelec.gov.ph;

by Facebook Messenger via https://fb.com/overseasvotingph

Upon receipt of the application, COMELEC-OFOV will schedule a videoconference with the applicant for identity verification and oath taking.

 

However, new registrants as overseas voters and those whose biometric data have yet to be captured are required to set an appointment and personally appear at their nearest Embassy or Consulate. The directory of Philippine Embassies and Consulates may be accessed through this link: https://dfa.gov.ph/about/dfa-directory/our-foreign-service-posts-dfa.

 

Let’s continue to strengthen our democracy. It’s our right and duty. REGISTER AND VOTE! END

 

 

Source: Republic of Philippines Department Of Foreign Affairs

PH, AUSTRALIA HOLD 5TH PHILIPPINES-AUSTRALIA MINISTERIAL MEETING (PAMM) TO ELEVATE COMPREHENSIVE PARTNERSHIP

PASAY 25 August 2021 – The Philippines and Australia held the 5th Philippines-Australia Ministerial Meeting (PAMM) on 23 August 2021, as a highlight of the 75th anniversary of bilateral relations between the Philippines and Australia this year.

The Philippine side was led by Secretary of Foreign Affairs Teodoro L. Locsin Jr. and Secretary of Trade and Industry Ramon M. Lopez while the Australian delegation was headed by Minister for Foreign Affairs and Women Senator Marise Payne and Minister for Trade, Tourism and Investment Dan Tehan, MP.

In his opening remarks, Secretary Locsin highlighted that despite the COVID-19 pandemic, both countries have found ways to maintain and expand cooperation across the full range of our relations.”

Foreign Minister Payne said that the Philippines-Australia friendship “is anchored by shared democratic values, by “Mateship and Bayanihan”, and commitment to peace and prosperity. (Both countries) have an important multifaceted relationship, particularly reflected in our strong defense and security ties, our longstanding security program, the strength of our people-to-people links, the work that we do in trade, commercial and economic areas, underpinned by our Comprehensive Partnership.”

Cooperation is ongoing between the Philippines and Australia, under the “Partnerships for Recovery” framework. The Ministers acknowledged ongoing development cooperation initiatives, such as Australia’s support for the Philippines’ peace-building efforts in the BARMM and in responding to humanitarian crises, as well as promoting post-pandemic economic recovery.

The Foreign Ministers also reaffirmed both countries’ close engagement in the areas of security, counter-terrorism and in the management of other non-traditional security threats such as cybersecurity, as well as both countries’ mutual interest to ensure regional stability. Maritime security was also a focus of discussion, including the creation of new bilateral maritime cooperation mechanisms and the upgrade of maritime law enforcement and domain awareness capabilities.

Secretary Lopez and Trade Minister Tehan underscored the role of the PAMM as an important mechanism to foster greater collaboration on two-way trade flows, creating conditions for mutual investment and for businesses to flourish, as well as cooperation in the multilateral trading system. Both sides agreed to work closely to resolve lingering market access issues and the elimination of unnecessary barriers to trade.

Australia is a significant economic partner of the Philippines, with US$3.6 billion in bilateral trade in 2019, and a total investment stock in the Philippines of A$7.2 billion. There are over 300 Australian companies operating in the Philippines, employing thousands of Filipinos in the business process outsourcing, infrastructure, banking, telecommunications, energy and education sectors.

As a commitment under the Joint Declaration of the Philippines-Australia Comprehensive Partnership, the four ministers/secretaries endorsed the Philippines-Australia Plan of Action 2021-2022, as a significant step towards the elevation of bilateral relations into a strategic partnership in the near future.

 

Source: Republic of Philippines Department Of Foreign Affairs