A MEETING in China of foreign ministers from Southeast Asian nations over the South China Sea ended in confusion Tuesday after Malaysia released and then retracted a joint statement expressing “serious concerns” over developments in the disputed waterway.

 

The disarray raises fresh questions about unity within the 10-member Association of Southeast Asian Nations over the issue, ahead of an international court ruling on a Philippine challenge to China’s claims to more than 80 percent of the waterway.

 

Asean operates on consensus, which means all members need to agree on a statement before it is released.

 

So far Asean has avoided citing China by name in statements calling for a lowering of tensions. China’s claims criss-cross those by nations including the Philippines, Vietnam, Brunei, and Malaysia, and it has reclaimed thousands of acres of land in the area in recent years while boosting its military presence. It has argued that the disputes in the waters that handle more than $5 trillion of trade a year have nothing to do with its relationship with Asean.

Prime Ministers Xi Jinping and Najib Razak

Photo credit: wikipedia.org

 

After noting progress in ties between China and Asean, the withdrawn statement added: “But we also cannot ignore what is happening in the South China Sea as it is an important issue in the relations and cooperation between Asean and China.”

 

That phrase in the statement is “a direct rebuke to China’s position that the dispute is not a matter between Asean and China,” said Ian Storey, a senior fellow at the Institute of Southeast Asian Studies in Singapore. China has said the disputes should be handled on a bilateral basis.

 

China’s foreign ministry said in April after a meeting with Laos, Cambodia and Brunei that the countries agreed the disputes

 

“are not an issue between China and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, and should not affect China-Asean relations.”

 

The Philippines has asked The Hague tribunal to rule on the status of features China contests as well as the legal basis of its “historic rights” claim, based on a 1940s map showing a dashed line covering around 1.4 million square miles. A ruling seen as unfavorable to Beijing would undermine its claims.

 

The US, which says it doesn’t take a position on the disputes, has since October last year sailed warships three times near China’s artificial islands to demonstrate the right to transit what it considers international territory. The tensions go to the heart of a strategic rivalry between the US, overseer of the region’s security network for decades, and a rising China intent on becoming the region’s dominant power.

 

Both have sought to gather support in the lead-up to the arbitration decision, with diplomats and officials visiting a number of Asean nations. China claims the support of countries as varied as Russia, Gambia, Belarus and Kazakhstan. Still, Group of Seven leaders expressed concern about instability in the South China Sea at a meeting in Japan last month.

 

Asean has a history of struggling to agree on communiques amid disagreement over wording on the South China Sea. China is the largest trading partner for the grouping, which is chaired this year by the small country of Laos.

 

Defense ministers from the bloc were unable to agree on a declaration after a meeting in Kuala Lumpur in November. In August foreign ministers struggled to reach consensus on the matter, releasing a statement hours after the end of a three-day meeting.

 

In 2012, Asean failed to reach common ground on the South China Sea issue, ending a regional conference without a joint statement—the first in its 45-year history. After the meeting collapsed, Cambodia denied it had fallen prey to pressure from China to avoid raising the issue in the statement. China had warned nations beforehand to not mention the territorial spats.

 

About three hours after the Kunming statement was released  on Tuesday  night, Malaysia said it needed to be retracted to make urgent changes. An amended statement has not been released.

 

Singapore’s foreign ministry said in a separate statement late  Tuesday  that Foreign Minister Vivian Balakrishnan “noted the serious concerns expressed by the Asean foreign ministers over the developments on the ground” in the South China Sea.

 

A ministry spokeswoman said Balakrishnan, who co-chaired the meeting, left Kunming  Tuesday. Thailand’s Foreign Ministry did not immediately respond to questions on whether it planned its own statement.

 

Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi described the meeting as “a timely and important strategic communication,” according to a statement posted late  Tuesday  on the ministry’s website.

 

“There is more cooperation than disagreement in the China-Asean relationship, and more opportunities than challenges, more unity than friction,” Wang was quoted as saying.

 

Still, state-run tabloid the Global Times published an editorial  Wednesday  with the headline: “Asean slapped China in the face over South China Sea? Western media’s crazy thoughts.” It said there was no joint statement from the meeting, and any such communique would require all parties to approve it.

 

The strongly worded statement that was later retracted warned that recent actions in the disputed South China Sea had “the potential to undermine peace.”

 

“We expressed our serious concerns over recent and ongoing developments, which have eroded trust and confidence, increased tensions and which may have the potential to undermine peace, security and stability in the South China Sea,” the original statement said, without mentioning China by name.

 

“We emphasized the importance of non-militarization and self-restraint in the conduct of all activities, including land reclamation, which may raise tensions in the South China Sea,” it said.

 

“We articulated Asean’s commitment to maintaining and promoting peace, security and stability in the region, as well as to the peaceful resolution of disputes.”

 

This, the statement added, includes “full respect for legal and diplomatic processes, without resorting to the threat or use of force, in accordance with universally recognized principles of international law, including the Unclos (United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea) and the UN Charter.”

 

The statement came after what was characterized as “a candid exchange”—language that hinted at a diplomatic set-to —between the bloc’s foreign ministers and their Chinese counterpart in the Chinese city of Kunming.

 

The Chinese foreign ministry expressed puzzlement over the diplomatic dance, and denied any official document had been issued.

 

“We have checked with the Asean side, and the so-called statement reported by AFP [Agence France-Presse] is not an official Asean document,” spokesman Lu Kang said.

Source: The Standard